An ERP Study Of A Truth That’s Told With Bad Intent On Teenagers—From The Perspective Of Theory Of Mind

The junior middle school stage is the good faith moral character formation of the critical period,In daily life to learn,hard to avoid encounting deception,Most people waste attention and energy on the lie is true or not,is the fact or the truth.Actually focusing lies intention is more important.This research through the social situation cheat,analysis a truth that’s told with bad intent of brain electrical characteristics.From the perspective of theory of mind,discussing cheating,the influence of psychological theory on deception abilities and waves of deception.Provides certain theoretical basis,methods,and guidance for later study.Study1:Collating and adaptation The Faux Pas Task and double deception missions,analysis reliability and validity.Study2-1: Based on Carrion’s experimental procedures.Through factor analysis of variance analysis behavior and ERP data,to explore the relationship between the different forms of cheating and honesty.If there are similar cognitive processing between Double cheat and deception.Study2-2:based on study 2-1 data,the score of XT as participants cheating ability.Through the Pearson correlation,analysis of the relationship between cheat ability,MFN amplitude and theory of mind.Among the influence each other,to discuss cheat ability and MFN amplitude differences between high and low group.Study the following conclusions:1.Theory of mind tasks after adaptation,suitable for junior middle school students,reliability and validity is excellent.2.On introuce condition,Cheating than honest behavior error rate increase,lower accuracy.3.Indicates deceive significantly longer indicates honesty,choose deceit and choose honesty condition,need similar reaction time.4.MFN sensitive in cognitive control and conflict processing.The MFN wave of choose deceit,choose honesty,indicates deceive significantly less than indicates honesty;The freedom to choose,corresponds to cheat in real life situations,cheating,which is instructed by subjects must be conducted according to the instruction from the computer stereotype of fraud,lack of ecological validity.Under the condition of the choice of two kinds of cheating(bad attempt to honest behavior,the common cheating)cognitive control and conflict processing resources consumption more thanthe instructions under the condition of cheating.5.N2 amplitude generated in the forehead,when individuals when dealing with complex tasks that cheating(choose honest,choose cheating)than honest N2 incubation period is longer,more negative amplitude.P3 amplitude was negative correlation with task difficulty,deception(choose honest,choose cheating)than honest P3 amplitude is small,high load.But due to the lack of ecological validity indicates conditions indicate deception and honesty there is no difference between N2 and P3 components.6.Choose honesty(double deception)is a truth that’s told with bad intent,sometimes when others don’t believe in yourself instead of telling the truth to mislead others.And normal deception(false statements on things,choose cheating)have similar cognitive control process needs and conflict.7.When choosing honesty,if TOM is better,the stronger the subjects ability of deception,the more cognitive control need and conflict processing consumption.