Researches On The Elements Of Logical Paradox From The Perspective Of Reasonable Action Paradox

Paradox has always been a hot topic in the study of logic,and the basic theoretical research on paradox is more enduring.Studying the basic theories of logical paradoxes helps people better understand the cause of the "weird phenomenon" in the field of human thinking,thereby better dissolving the paradoxes and promoting the research of paradoxes in epistemology and methodology.This article intends to carry out related research on the definition of strict paradox,starting with the argument between Professor Zhang Jianjun and Professor Wang Tiansi,and sorting out the basic constituent elements of strict paradox.On the basis of clarifying the basic differences between the two views and the definition of the paradox,the in-depth research and thinking of the constituent elements of the strict paradox are conducted.Combined with the construction process of the "reasonable action paradox",reflect on the similarities and differences between the views held by Mr.Zhang Jianjun and Mr.Wang Tiansi,and further analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the two theories.The article points out that the "reasonable action paradox" cannot be constructed based on the elements of the paradox of descriptive theory,but it raises new problems.And based on the "three elements" theory,it not only constructs the "reasonable action paradox",but also provides a direction for resolving this new paradox.The emergence of the "three elements" theory has greatly promoted the understanding of the reasonable action paradox and has also greatly promoted the understanding of the paradox in the domestic academic community.To understand the cause of the paradox,the resolution of the paradox points out the direction.This article adopts a comparative research method to compare the opinions of two scholars on the elements of paradox and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the two theories in comparison.The article also adopts the method of contradiction analysis.It uses the method of contradiction analysis to dialectically treat the theory of the elements of logical paradox.While summarizing and analyzing the merits of the theory,it must also treat the problems and deficiencies in the theory correctly.