| Chinese women's volleyball team won the title in the 2016 Rio Olympic Games which became the hot topic of the media,the official,the public.It is of great value to study the serve technology,compare the different serve placement,find the advantages and disadvantages in the aspects of service technical for Chinese women's volleyball team and can provide a reference for the sustainable development.This study takes the match videos of six teams participating in the 2016 Rio Olympic women's volleyball team as the research objects.They include China,Serbia,Italy,the United States,the Netherlands and Brazil.By using the method of video statistics,literature,mathematical statistics,comparative analysis and others,we could get the results by analyzing.According to the statistical analysis of serve effect and data,we could provide some advice in the competition and training for Chinese women's volleyball team.The results are as follows:1.The Chinese women's volleyball team and others always made jumping the floating serves as the main means of scoring in the way of serving,followed by the standing-floating serves,the power jump serve was less.Comparing the standing-floating service to jumping floater serve,the jumping floater serve was stronger in the scoring ability.It had a higher breaking and erro rate,while the standing-floating service at a lower breaking and erro rate.Compared with others in the serve technology,the standing-service and the jumping floater serve were main for Chinese.The other countries were jumping floater serve and jumping spike serve,especially the United States,Serbia,the Netherlands and Brazil.2.According to the statistics of the five games,the Chinese team only was in the fight against Brazil with breaking when the power jump serve,and others was not.They were better than the standing-service and jumping floater serve in the scoring and breaking,but more mistakes for Serbia,the United States,Brazil,the Netherlands and Italy;in the jump floating serves,the number of breaking for Chinese was less than the United States and Brazil while more than Serbia,Italy and the Netherlands;in the the standing-service,the Chinese team was more than other five countries.3.The Chinese team was lower than others in the scoring rate of power jump serve;in the jumping floater serve,the Chinese was a lower rate than Netherlands and Brazil,and was higher than Italy,the United States,Serbia;in the standing-service the Chinese team was higher than the other five countries.4.In the erro rate of power jump serve,the Chinese team only played against Italy,the United States,Brazil with it,but using less.When against Brazil,the Chinese team was at a higher erro rate,being against the United States and Italy at a lower rate in this three games;in the erro rate of jumping floater serve,the Chinese was higher than Serbia,while a lower erro rate than four other countries;in the erro rate of standing-service,the Chinese team was higher than others because the times other five countries used were fewer.5.According to the statistics of five games,the probability of sending the placement was large in the left and the middle area,the right area was small.And the position of 1,5,6 was the most while the number of points in the 2,3,4 was less,on which Chinese and foreign teams were more similar.6.From the overall effect of serve technology view,the Chinese team was not dominant in the score and the breakout rate,but in the lost points was significantly lower than other countries,and always regarded jumping floater serve as the main form of serve.The Serbian women's volleyball team not only had a strong strength and the highest breaking rate in the level of jumping floater serve,but also illustrated that there was a gap between the current domestic women's volleyball team and foreign teams in the serve;our serve and tactics was more stable but not attack power.Meanwhile,the serve of Serbia had a strong attack,but the erro rate was also higher under a higher serve rate. |
PDF Full Text Request