Research On The Rehabilitation Effect Of Fitness Yoga On Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain

1.PurposesBy observing and analyzing the effects of fitness yoga exercises on pain,related physical dysfunction,quality of life and gait-related indicators in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain,it provides a practical theoretical basis for the relief and treatment of non-specific chronic low back pain.2.MethodThirty subjects who met the diagnosis of non-specific chronic low back pain were selected and randomly divided into experimental group and control group,with 15 people in each group.The control group only participated in the study of rehabilitation theory knowledge without exercise intervention;the experimental group performed four stages of fitness yoga while learning the rehabilitation theory knowledge.The experimental period was eight weeks.After the experiment,the VAS score,JOA score,RMDQ score,and gait index of the two groups of subjects were compared and analyzed.3.Result 3.1 VAS score change: After eight weeks of experiments,there was a very significant difference in the experimental group(P <0.01),but no significant difference in the control group(P> 0.05);the experimental group and the control group were found through comparison between the groups There was a significant difference between them(P <0.05).3.2 Changes in JOA scores: After eight weeks of experiments,the comparison results within the group showed that there was a significant difference in the experimental group(P <0.05),but there was no significant difference in the control group(P> 0.05).There was no statistical significance between the groups(P> 0.05),and there was a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group after the experiment(P <0.05).3.3 Changes in RMDQ score: After eight weeks of experiments,there was a very significant difference in the experimental group(P<0.01),but no significant difference in the control group(P> 0.05);the experimental group and the control group were found through comparison between the groups There was a significant difference between them(P <0.05).3.4 Gait index changes:(1)After the eight-week experiment,the control group showed no statistical changes in parameters such as step length,step width and pace(P> 0.05);the step length increased after the experiment in the experimental group and there was a significant difference(P <0.05),no significant difference in step width(P> 0.05).The comparison between the control group and the experimental group during the same period found that there was a significant difference in pace(P<0.05);there was no significant difference between the group and the control group before and after the experiment(P>0.05).There was a very significant difference(P<0.01).(2)After the experiment,the gait cycle of the experimental group was significantly different from that of the same group before treatment(P<0.05),and compared with the control group during the same period(P<0.01).(3)There was no significant difference in the maximum angle of hip flexion,the maximum angle of knee flexion and the maximum angle of ankle flexion in the control group before and after the experiment.Compared with the same group before treatment,the experimental group showed a very significant difference between the maximum angle of hip flexion and the maximum angle of ankle flexion(P<0.01),and the maximum angle of hip flexion was significantly different(P<0.05);Compared with the same period,the maximum angle of hip flexion,the maximum angle of knee flexion and the maximum angle of ankle flexion were significantly different(P<0.05).(4)In the experimental group,the range of motion in the sagittal plane after the hip and ankle joint experiments was significantly increased,with a significant difference(P<0.05),and the range of motion in the sagittal plane after the knee joint experiment was significantly reduced,which was also significant There was no significant difference(P<0.05)in the control group(P>0.05);there was no significant difference in the sagittal motion range of the hip,knee and ankle joints between the experimental group and the control group before the experiment(P>0.05),there was a very significant difference in the sagittal plane motion range of the hip and knee joints between the groups after the experiment(P<0.01),and there was a significant difference in the sagittal plane motion range of the ankle joint(P <0.05).4.Conclusion 4.1 Fitness yoga can relieve and recover the pain symptoms of patients with non-specific chronic low back pain;4.2 Fitness yoga can improve gait indexes such as step length,pace,gait cycle,hip,knee,and ankle flexion maximum angle,sagittal motion range of hip,knee,and ankle joints in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain;4.3 Fitness yoga intervention improves the quality of life and physical function of patients with non-specific chronic low back pain.