Study On The Productive Protection Of Pingnan Grass Medicine In Fujian Province

This essay focuses on Grass Medicine in Pingnan County,Ningde City,Fujian Province.Through the field research and case studies,the essay is aimed to discuss how people should protect and inherit traditional medical intangible cultural heritage under the productive protection mode.The paper is divided into three parts:The first chapter discusses the creative transformation of the cultural resources of Pingnan Qingcao Medicine,which is carried out by analyzing the practice of Fujian Yubaitong Biological Co.,Ltd.Yubaitong Company transforms Pingnan Qingcao Medicine cultural resources with economic potential and market value into economic resources through production,which provides practical basis for productive protection to be an important way for creative transformation of traditional culture.The second chapter analyzes the inheritance and development of Pingnan Qingcao Medicine in the management and development of Fujian Yubaitong Biological Co.,Ltd.from a traditional perspective.Tradition is not only a tradition that requires the cultural content of Pingnan Qingcao Medicine,but also a tradition of protection.Only by adhering to the premise of protection,respecting the living inheritance,adapting the intangible cultural heritage to the market environment,and achieving the function of self-blood production Achieve moderate development of productive protection.The third chapter analyzes the legal rights and the subjects of Pingnan Grass Medical Production Protection from the comparison of the special civil rights protection mode established under the World Intellectual Property Organization intellectual property model and the intangible cultural heritage protection model advocated by United Nations Educational,Scientific and Cultural Organization.The analysis found that in the application of the intangible cultural heritage,the current intellectual property protection system has a situation where the rights subject,rights object,and the protection period are not compatible.Laws and regulations must be adjusted to solve the judicial problems that arise in the process of productive protection.