Font Size: a A A

Clinical Study Of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Spinal Decompression Combined With Bushen Zhuangjin Decoction In The Treatment Of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Due To Liver-Kidney Deficiency

Posted on:2022-11-05Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:J C XuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2504306614478204Subject:Computer Software and Application of Computer
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective To observe the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic(UBE)unilateral laminotomy biportal decompression(ULBD)combined with Bushen Zhuangjin decoction(BZD)in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis(DLSS)due to Liver-Kidney Deficiency,and compare it with simple UBE-ULBD or microscopic ULBD surgery(MicroULBD)to explore the clinical value of UBE-ULBD combined with traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of DLSS due to Liver-Kidney Deficiency.Methods DLSS cases due to Liver-Kidney Deficiency treated in Hangzhou Hospital of traditional Chinese Medicine from December 2019 to January 2021 were collected and divided into Micro-ULBD group(n=30),UBE-ULBD group(n=30)and UBE combined with BZD group(n=30).The clinical efficacy was evaluated by visual analogue pain score(VAS),Oswestry disability index(ODI)and modified MacNab criteria.The enlarged cross-sectional area of dural sac and the proportion of facet joint preservation were calculated by MRI and CT.The degree of injury was evaluated by the changes of serum Hemoglobin(Hb)and C-reactive protein(CRP)after operation.Results(1)There was no significant difference in surgical levels,sex,age,body mass index and the incidence of underlying diseases(hypertension and diabetes)among the three groups(P>0.05).(2)Compared with the UBE-ULBD group and the UBE combined with BZD group,the Micro-ULBD group had more blood loss,longer operation time and longer postoperative hospital stay,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).(3)The VAS and ODI score of the three groups were improved in different degrees at 1 month,3 months and 6 months after operation.At 1 month after operation,the VAS and ODI score of UBE combined with BZD group were better than those of Micro-ULBD group and UBE-ULBD group(P<0.05).At 3 months after operation,the VAS score of the UBE combined with BZD group was better than that of the Micro-ULBD group,and the ODI score of the UBE combined with BZD group was better than that of the Micro-ULBD group and the UBE-ULBD group(P<0.05).At 6 months after operation,there was no significant difference in the VAS score among the three groups(P>0.05),but the ODI score in the UBE combined with BZD group was better than that in the Micro-ULBD group(P<0.05).At the last follow-up,the curative effect was evaluated according to the modified MacNab criteria,and the excellent and good rate of UBE combined with BZD group was better than that of Micro-ULBD group(P<0.05).(4)There was no significant difference in the enlarged cross-sectional area of dural sac among the three groups(P>0.05).The proportion of ipsilateral and contralateral facet joint preservation in Micro-ULBD group was lower than that in UBE group and UBE combined with BZD group(P<0.05).(5)There was no significant difference in serum Hb and CRP among the three groups before operation.Compared with the difference of Hb before and after operation,the Hb in Micro-ULBD group decreased more after operation,and there was significant difference compared with the other two groups(P<0.05).The serum CRP and the difference of CRP before and after operation in Micro-ULBD group were significantly higher than those in the other two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion UBE-ULBD surgery could obtain a good clinical effect for the treatment of DLSS,with complete decompression,less bleeding,less surgical injury,shorter postoperative hospital stay and less impact on postoperative spinal stability.BZD could improve the clinical efficacy of UBE-ULBD in the treatment of DLSS due to Liver-Kidney Deficiency,which was helpful to relieve pain and improve lumbar function after operation.
Keywords/Search Tags:lumbar spinal stenosis, unilateral biportal endoscopy, unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression, Bushen Zhuangjin decoction
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
Comparison Of The Efficacy Of Unilateral Laminotomy For Bilateral Decompression Between Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy And Uniportal Endoscopy In The Treatment Of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
A Comparative Study Of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy And Laminectomy With Fusion And Internal Fixation In The Treatment Of Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Early Clinical Efficacy Of Unilateral Laminotomy For Bilateral Decompression Through Interlaminar Approach With Spinal Endoscopy And Modified TLIF In The Treatment Of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
The Clinical Study Of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treated With Unilateral Laminotomy For Bilateral Decompression Through Interlaminar Approach With Spinal Endoscopy
Comparison Of The Short-Term Efficacy Of UBE-ULBD And Minimally Invasive Channel Mi-ULBD For Single-Segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Comparison Of The Efficacy Of Unilateral Lamionmyfor Bilateral Decompression Between UBE And UE In The Treatment Of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Analysis Of Clinical Efficacy Of Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy And Bilateral Decompression In The Treatment Of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Efficacy Analysis Of Large Channel Endoscopic Unilateral Approach Bilateral Decompression And Posterior Approach Laminar Decompression With Interbody Fusion In The Treatment Of Single-segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Clinical Efficacy Study Of Two Unilateral Approach For Bilateral Decompression Techniques Under Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopy For Single Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
10 Unilateral Laminotomy For Bilateral Decompression Of Lumbar Spinal Steosis Disease Anatomic Studies