On The Strain Problem Of Existence And Account In Metaphysics Zeta Volume

This article mainly tries to permeate Aristotle’s Metaphysics Zeta Volume according to the clue between existence and description,so as to solve some of the theoretical problems.The tension between the sight of existence and description has always existed in Aristotle’s metaphysics,and if this sight is used as the main clue in the analysis of themetaphysics Zeta volume,it can help us understand many of Aristotle’s Concepts provide very effective help,especially in solving the problems of individuality and universality of the form and how the resulting knowledge is possible.It is necessary to understand the relationship between existence and description of these two fields.This article will try to prove that Aristotle himself also made a conscious distinction between existence and description in the process of demonstrating the problem.First,they were separated and discussed,and then they continued to face new problems while trying to establish a channel for communication between the two,so that the discussion has been steadily promoted,and the description and existence are distinguished from each other and communicated in the text.The tension between existence and description will always accompany the beginning and end of the Zeta volume,and the problems caused by its tension cannot be properly resolved in the Zeta volume.In the specific writing,I will explain the following ideas:In the first part,we will briefly sort out the entity candidates and their standards,and then compare the literal contradictions of the entities identified in Category and Metaphysics,and then throw Aristotle in the line of writing.There is a point of view that is different from the field of description in order to clarify the literal contradiction between Category and Metaphysics.The second part examines the discussion of generation and knowledge in Z7-11.It shows that Aristotle did not give up the previous path of differentiating and correcting description and existence.He continued to advance the problem in accordance with this thinking.Inside things,the problems of individuality and universality of form are raised.This is the most obvious position in the entire Zeta volume between the existence and description of the two,and directly causes the epistemology dilemma,although Aristotle’s Functionalism was introduced,but the problem of defining knowledge was not properly addressed.The third part,combined with Aristotle’s argument on definition in Z10-Z16,discusses how the definition knowledge in the Zeta volume is possible.Unfortunately,only within the scope of the Zeta volume,Aristotle’s processing of the definition knowledge has not been completely successful,and it can be said that the deviation between the existence and description has not been corrected in the Zeta volume.In the fourth part,the tension between the existence and the description always accompanies the beginning and end of the Zeta volume,and it has not been effectively resolved in the Zeta volume.It must be resolved with the help of discussions in other chapters and works of Aristotle.