A Comparative Study Of Special Collections Summary In Qing Dynasty Of The General Catalogue Of The Four Libraries Between The Pavilion Edition And Final Edition

The general catalogue of the four libraries(hereinafter referred as "General Catalog")has three systems,namely the manuscript system,the cabinet system and the final system.These three systems are the three changing dimensions of the text generation of the "General Catalog".From its appearance to its prosperity,many scholars have conducted research on the "Zongmu".The manuscripts,cabinets,and finals are all based on their research perspectives,based on literature,literature,ideas and other aspects,in-depth analysis,and achieved many results.With the emergence of various documents of the "Zongmu",especially the combing of manuscripts,cabinet editions,and final versions,the entire process of the compilation and completion of the "Zongmu" is dynamically presented.The content of this article is to compare the summary of Qingren’s collections from the book of "Zongmu" to the final edition,and analyze the evaluation criteria of the officials of the Qing Dynasty’s collections of scholars in the early Qing Dynasty."Zongmu" records forty-two collections of Qing Dynasty people,which is the smallest number among all the dynasties recorded.Studying the dynamic development of the summary of Qing Dynasty’s special collections from the pavilion system to the fixed version system,we can understand the appearance of the literary world in the early Qing Dynasty,and have a glimpse of the guiding role of the "Zongmu" in the writing and editing process of the Qing Dynasty literary style and the world.This article is divided into five parts.The introduction is a literature review,sorting out the status quo of the comparative study of the "Zongmu" version and the final version,and sorting out and summarizing the research trends and research results of the academic circle.The first chapter is a comparative study of the Qing Dynasty’s collection of abstracts and the system.There are three versions of Wenyuan Pavilion,Wenjin Pavilion,and Wensu Pavilion in the existing complete pavilion system of "Zongmu".Although the three pavilions belong to the same pavilion system,the content of the summary is larger.In and out.It is specifically manifested in document differences and evaluation differences.Document differences refer to the difference in the number of volumes recorded in the Sange version of the synopsis of the same separate collection,and the evaluation difference refers to the ideological evaluation content recorded in the Sange version of the synopsis of the same separate set.different.Researching and sorting out these differences and differences can clarify the reasons for these problems,understand the psychological mechanism of the composing of the Sange summary,and then conduct a documentary and ideological review of the Ge Benqing Collection,and complete the review of Ge Benqing.The identification of the value of the summary of people’s collection.The second chapter is the research on the significant difference between Geben and Dingben Qingren Collection.In addition to the internal differences in the Geben system,the summary of Qingren’s special collections also has differences in content between Geben and Dingben systems.After comparison,it is found that the differences in the document version and evaluation content between the cabinet version and the final version are more obvious than the differences within the cabinet version.Mistakes and omissions in the document version reflect the many problems that the officials had in writing the summary,including the replacement of the Siku base copy.The difference in content evaluation shows the development context of the summary content writing from rough to precise,from point to surface.The in-depth study of the issue of the obvious differences in the abstracts of the collections from the Geben to the Dingben Qing Dynasty helps to understand the inner logic of Guanchen’s literary thoughts.The third chapter is the research on the hidden factors of the abstracts from Geben to Dingben Qingren.The obvious difference reflected in the change from the official version to the final version of the summary of the Qing Dynasty Special Collections implies the hidden factors behind the change.The invisible factors are mainly in two aspects: one is the increasing esteem for Wang Shizhen;the second is to highlight the literary controversy that occurred in the literary world of the early Qing Dynasty.These two hidden factors promoted the prosperous and vigorous display of the literary world in the early Qing dynasty in the context of "Zongmu" and the reshuffle and integration of the literary style of the late Ming Dynasty.The fourth chapter explores the dynamic changes from Geben to Dingben Qingren Collection,and analyzes the development trend of the summary from mechanical judgment to concept consciousness.Although the summary of Geben Qingren’s Collection has been formed,it is still sparse,unable to provide strong guidance and guidance on the style of writing and the world in the Qing Dynasty.Through a certain "difference" consciousness action,the officials compared the Dingben Qingrenjiji with Mingrenjiji and other writings of this dynasty,and shaped the leading role of Qingrenjiji for the writing style of the early Qing Dynasty."Zongmu",with its own "designated" status,further shaped the Qing Dynasty collections from the background of "Guo Dynasty",and emphasized its guidance to Qing literati’s creation from the national level.Under this dual effect,the concept of the abstract from the collection of Geben to Dingbenqing was completed.