| In 2007,the Qingzhen Environmental Protection Court and the Guiyang Intermediate Court Environmental Resources Trial Court were established in Guiyang City,marking the beginning of the practice of China’s Environmental Protection Court.This judicial initiative effectively explores the specialized practice of environmental justice without breaking the construction of ordinary courts.To this day,the practice of Guizhou Environmental Protection Court has gone through nearly 16 years,and the judicial effects it brings will inevitably leave irreplaceable value and wealth for environmental justice.The Guizhou Environmental Protection Court has accumulated a lot of experience in the reform of environmental specialization.Secondly,it has effectively promoted the effective protection of Guizhou’s ecological environment,helping Guizhou advance towards the leading area of ecological civilization construction on the basis of building an ecological civilization experimental zone.Furthermore,the Environmental Protection Court has effectively promoted the development of Guizhou’s green economy,which is gradually playing a pivotal role in Guizhou.This article will study the judicial effect of environmental protection courts in Guizhou based on practical investigations,analyze the lack of experience in the operation process of environmental protection courts,and sort out the current situation,effects,and difficulties faced by environmental protection courts one by one,aiming to point out the direction for the development of environmental protection courts and explore the laws of their judicial effects.This article will conduct research through text analysis,empirical analysis,and SWOT analysis to summarize the operational experience of Guizhou Environmental Protection Court and its judicial effects,providing sample experience for the innovation and improvement of environmental judicial specialization.The research content of this article is as follows:The first part is the current situation of Guizhou Environmental Protection Court.By sorting out the research situation,the operational status of the environmental protection court is described from three dimensions: the current composition of the environmental protection court,the judicial practice status,and the characteristics of practical operation.The second part is the manifestation of the judicial effect of Guizhou Environmental Protection Court.By sorting out the operation status of the environmental protection court and focusing on the current conclusion of the first part,analyze and summarize the contribution of the environmental protection court to the ecological environment of Guizhou in the past year.Firstly,its promotion of specialized construction of environmental justice;Secondly,its construction of environmental protection and diversified governance of the ecological environment;Furthermore,there are many guarantees for the development of green economy and industrial upgrading.The third part discusses the shortcomings in the operation of Guizhou Environmental Protection Court.Everything has its pros and cons,and the contribution of environmental courts cannot be ignored,but there are inevitably some unforeseen or unavoidable shortcomings.The environmental protection court’s efforts and role in protecting the ecological environment are still relatively insufficient,especially the slow development of professional trials.This article will analyze the shortcomings and judicial effects of Guizhou Environmental Protection Court from a third-party perspective,paying attention to the reasons and difficulties that arise.The fourth part is the suggested countermeasures.In response to the difficulties and shortcomings summarized in the third part,combined with the construction experience of domestic and foreign environmental protection courts,and using the SWOT analysis model to analyze the internal and external advantages and disadvantages faced by environmental protection courts,explore the optimal path for future development,and propose improvement measures for Guizhou environmental protection courts,in order to provide higher judicial effects and establish an excellent benchmark for judicial specialization nationwide. |