Clinical Evaluation Of Acupuncture Rehabilitation Combined With Respiratory Training In The Treatment Of Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain in improving physiological function,reducing pain and improving quality of life,and to seek a treatment plan with significant efficacy,both symptoms and root causes,and high safety.Methods:The 99 volunteers with chronic non-specific low back pain were randomly divided into group A(acupuncture treatment),Group B(needle,acupuncture+rehabilitation training)and group C(needle,acupuncture+rehabilitation training+respiratory training).All three groups of volunteers received conventional treatment including acupuncture treatment.Treatment was arranged once in the afternoon of 1 week,2 week week,3 times in 1 week,and 4 week for 4 weeks,a total of 12 times.The scores of the three groups of volunteers were assessed before the initial treatment and through the Disability Index(ODI),the pain digital assessment scale(NRS)was used to assess pain,and the daily living status was assessed by the 12-item health survey brief(SF-12).The scores of each scale before and after treatment in the three groups were compared within and between groups and observed whether adverse events occurred.Results:The three groups of ODI score,NRS score,and SF-12 score were significantly improved after treatment compared with those before treatment in this group,The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);Among the various domain scores for the SF-12,Within the three groups,there were significant improvements in the four related areas,namely,somatic activity function(PF),somatic function restriction on role function(RP),somatic pain(BP)and emotional restriction on role function(RE),before treatment in the same group(P<0.05),the remaining fields were not significant between before and after treatment(P>0.05).Post-treatment,from the inter-group score of the ODI,The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05);Comparison of the scores obtained from the post-treatment NRS,There were no significant difference between groups A and B and B and C(P>0.05),However,the scores between groups A and C were statistically significant by comparison(P<0.01),In the SF-12 scale,There was no significant difference in scores between the MCS groups(P>0.05),PCS groups(P<0.05),From the SF-12,the comparison between the groups of somatic activity function(PF)and somatic function restriction on role function(RP)were statistically significant(P<0.05),In group comparison of somatic pain(BP)scores,There was no significant difference between Groups A and B and B and C(P>0.05),Statistically significant between groups A and C(P<0.05);No group comparison was significant after treatment(P>0.05).Conclusion:All the three groups can play a role in improving physiological function,reducing pain and improving quality of life in chronic non-specific low back pain.In this study,by comparing the data of three and different scales,it was found that group C was more effective than groups A and B.During the clinical observation of this study,all volunteers had no adverse reactions during the treatment,which confirmed that the treatment regimen of this study has a high safety profile and is suitable for its application in clinical practice.