Font Size: a A A

Efficacy And Safety Of Immunocheckpoint Inhibitor Combined With Chemotherapy In The Treatment Of Advanced Bladder Cancer

Posted on:2024-06-11Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:H H XuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2544307061980849Subject:Surgery
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of immuno checkpoint inhibitor combined chemotherapy(immuno+chemotherapy group),immuno checkpoint inhibitor dual drug combination(dual immuno group)and immuno checkpoint inhibitor single drug group(single immuno group)compared with chemotherapy in patients with advanced bladder cancer,so as to provide Evidence-based medicine basis for clinical drug combination.Methods: In the first part,we searched Pub Med,Webofscience,CNKI and other databases with computers for Document retrieval and Randomized controlled trial in the Clinical Trials.gov database.The search time was from the establishment of the database to February 1,2023.The researchers screened the literature according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria and used End Note20 reference Reference management software,collected the data of the included literature,and conducted literature quality evaluation and meta analysis through Rev Man5.4.1 software.The second part is a retrospective analysis of 45 patients with advanced bladder cancer who were admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to December 2022.All of them were confirmed as bladder urothelial cancer by pathological examination.Among them,15 patients received four cycles of combined chemotherapy with inhibitors at the immune checkpoint,and 30 patients received only four cycles of chemotherapy.The objective response rate,progression free survival period,adverse reactions,and risk factors affecting disease progression were compared between the two groups.Results: Meta analysis showed that compared with the chemotherapy group,the monoimmunization group had advantages in progression free survival(HR=1.33,95% CI:1.17-1.50,P<0.01),objective response rate(OR=0.42,95% CI: 0.35-0.50,P<0.01),and safety(OR=0.14,95% CI: 0.11-0.19,P<0.01),but there was no statistically significant difference in complete response rate between the two groups(OR=0.98,95% CI:0.74-1.31,P=0.91).Compared with the chemotherapy group,the immune plus chemotherapy group had advantages in overall survival(HR=0.85,95% CI: 0.74-0.96,P=0.01),progression free survival(HR=0.80,95% CI: 0.71-0.90,P=0.0003),objective response rate(OR=1.29,95% CI: 1.06-1.58,P=0.01),and complete response rate(OR=1.56,95% CI: 1.13-2.14,P=0.007);However,the immune+chemotherapy group is more prone to immune related adverse reactions(OR=1.57,95% CI: 1.05-2.36,P=0.03).There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival time(HR=0.91,95%CI: 0.74-1.13,P=0.41)and safety between the single and double immunization groups(OR=0.60,95% CI: 0.27-1.35,P=0.22).In the second part of the Case–control study,there was no significant difference between the two groups in age,gender,smoking history,T stage,N stage,M stage,and ECOG score(p>0.05),and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(p>0.05).Four of the 15 patients in the Immunosuppressive drug combined chemotherapy group progressed;20 out of 30 patients in the chemotherapy group progressed.The median PFS of the Immunosuppressive drug combined chemotherapy group was not reached,the median observation time was 12.1(10.5-13.6)months,and the median PFS of the chemotherapy group was 10.9(9.6-12.4)months.Log rank analysis showed that the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of disease progress showed that the treatment scheme(immunization+chemotherapy)was a protective factor(OR=0.082,p<0.001),and age and TNM stage were risk factors.Conclusions: 1.Compared with the chemotherapy group,the Immunosuppressive drug monotherapy group has better objective response rate and safety,but has no obvious advantage in prolonging the total survival period and progression free survival period.2.Both meta-analysis and retrospective study analysis suggest that compared with the chemotherapy group,the immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy regimen has a better objective response rate and complete response rate,and can significantly prolong overall survival and progression free survival.3.There was no significant difference in overall survival and incidence of adverse reactions between the dual drug combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the single drug group of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Keywords/Search Tags:immune checkpoint inhibitors, Chemotherapy, Advanced bladder cancer, Efficacy, Safety, Meta analysis
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
Meta-analysis Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Chemotherapy Combined With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors And Chemotherapy Alone In The First-line Treatment Of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Efficacy And Safety Analysis Of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined With Chemotherapy And Chemotherapy Alone In Second-line Treatment Of Patients With Advanced Biliary Malignancy
Efficacy And Safety Of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy In Second-line Treatment Of Advanced Esophageal Cancer:A Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials
Efficacy, Safety And Biomarker Analysis Of First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone For Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Study
Comparative Efficacy And Safety Of Second-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors After The Process Of First-line Chemotherapy In Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis
Efficacy And Safety Of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Therapy On Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Meta-analysis
The Efficacy And Safety Of Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors In The First-line Treatment Of Advanced Lung Cancer:a Network Meta-analysis
Meta-analysis Of The Efficacy Of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy In Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer At Different Ages
Efficacy Of PD-1/PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors For Advanced Nsclc According To PD-L1 Expression: A Meta-analysis
10 Efficacy And Safety Analysis Of Apatinib Combined With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors And Chemotherapy In Second Line Treatment Of Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma