| Objective: In order to prove the efficacy of multidisciplinary combination therapy in the treatment of chronic prostatitis type ⅢB.The patients with chronic prostatitis of type ⅢB were treated in different ways,and then compared with the changes of several related symptom scores to select a more effective treatment plan.Methods: According to the inclusion criteria of type ⅢB chronic prostatitis and after improving the relevant examinations,69 patients were collected from the outpatient department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University from October 2021 to October 2022.These patients were randomly divided into three groups: the combination of three treatments,the combination of two treatments and the group with only one treatment.Each group had 23 patients.For the patients in the first group,we were given biofeedback electric stimulation treatment,and after the treatment,we were given traditional Chinese medicine electroacupuncture treatment,and at the same time,we were also taking drugs routinely.The treatment plan of the second group is biofeedback electric stimulation treatment,and the oral medicine is also used to treat the disease every night.The last group is just taking medicine every day.Biofeedback electric stimulation therapy and electroacupuncture therapy are performed three times a week,while drug therapy is performed every day.Such treatment needs to last for two months.At the end of each month,we will conduct a follow-up survey on patients and ask them to fill in the NIH-CPSI form,IPSS form,Qo L form,and HAMD form.Results: Before treatment,after 1 month of treatment,and after all treatment: NIH-CPSI scores: combined group [(20.39 ± 5.47),(14.70 ± 3.75),(11.35 ± 2.46)],simple group [(20.87 ± 6.84),(16.00 ± 3.79),(13.00± 3.77)],control group [(20.30 ± 4.66),(18.48 ± 4.45),(17.61 ± 4.38)].IPSS scores: combined group[(12.65 ± 9.58),(5.78 ± 3.32),(4.35 ± 2.21)] points,simple group [(13.26 ± 6.61),(8.91 ± 3.87),(6.78 ±2.13)] Qo L score: combined group [(17.17 ± 12.31),(9.30 ± 4.04),(7.74 ± 3.92)],simple group [(15.09 ±8.47),(14.17 ± 5.34),(10.17 ± 3.23)],control group [(20.02 ± 7.16),(22.04 ± 7.30),(17.30 ± 7.53)]Combined group [(12.57 ± 7.73),(6.48 ± 4.43),(6.39 ± 3.41)] points,simple group [(12.87 ± 4.91),(8.96 ±5.19),(8.35 ± 4.17)] points,and [(12.35 ± 3.33),(10.96 ± 3.33),(10.87 ± 2.90)] points in the control group.There was no significant difference in the scores of patients in each group before treatment(P>0.05),and the scores of patients changed after different treatment methods.Except for Qo L score,all patients’ scores after treatment have improved significantly compared with those before treatment(P<0.05);After treatment,the IPSS score of patients in the combined group was significantly lower than that in the simple group;The improvement of depression and NIH-CPSI score in the simple group was not significantly different from that in the combined group.Conclusion: The biofeedback combined with electroacupuncture treatment can significantly relieve the symptoms of patients with ⅢB chronic prostatitis,improve the symptoms of patients and improve the quality of life of patients. |
PDF Full Text Request