Font Size: a A A

Early Clinical Efficacy Of Non-Fusion Techniques With IntraSPINE Hybrid Operation With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion In The Treatment Of Double-Segment Lumbar Degenerative Disease

Posted on:2024-07-21Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Z WangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2544307145450924Subject:Clinical Medicine
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective:To evaluate the early clinical efficacy of non-fusion techniques with IntraSPINE hybrid operation with TLIF in the treatment of double-segment LDD.Methods:A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 74 patients with double-segment LDD from September2019 to May 2021 who were treated by non-fusion techniques with IntraSPINE hybrid operation with TLIF and TLIF in our hospital.74 patients were divided into observation group(non-fusion techniques with IntraSPINE hybrid operation with TLIF)and control group(TLIF).36 cases in the observation group;38cases in the control group.There were 20 males and 16 females in observation group(aged 49.08±5.28 years),and 23 males and 15 females in control group(aged 50.97±5.69 years).The follow-up period in observation group and control group were respectively 25.44±5.46 months and 25.84±4.23 months.There were no statistical differences in gender,age or follow-up period between the two groups(P>0.05).The visual analogue scale(VAS)of back and leg pain,Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)score,Oswestry Disability Index(ODI)were recorded before surgery,at 3 months and 6 months after surgery,and final follow-up.At the same time,lumbar lordosis(LL),range of motion(ROM),and height of intervertebral space of the upper adjacent segment of fusion segment were measured on lateral lumbar X-ray films.And Pfirrmann grade of intervertebral disc of the upper adjacent segment of fusion segment on lumbar MRI were recorded before surgery and at final follow-up.The complications during the follow-up of the two groups of patients were recorded.Results:The operative time,intraoperative blood loss and length of hospitalization in observation group and control group were respectively(153.89±26.86)min and(141.57±26.41)min,(211.67±54.59)ml and(190.53±59.77)ml,(11.08±2.1)d and(10.97±2.4)d.There were no statistical differences in operative time,intraoperative blood loss,or length of hospitalization between the two groups(P>0.05).At pre-operation,3months,6 months after surgery and final follow-up,the VAS scores of back pain were(7.17±1.06),(2.17±0.75),(1.72±0.83)and(1.33±0.89)respectively in observation group,and those were(7.03±0.92),(2.83±0.75),(2.14±0.82)and(1.87±0.81)respectively in control group;the VAS scores of leg pain were(6.32±1.28),(2.35±1.01),(1.43±0.65)and(1.28±0.68)respectively in observation group,and those were(6.45±1.25),(2.36±0.98),(1.49±0.78)and(1.34±0.84)respectively in control group;the ODI scores were(50.03±7.74)%,(19.13±4.79)%,(17.64±4.97)% and(14.76±5.21)% respectively in observation group,and those were(49.79±7.68)%,(19.17±5.01)%,(17.86±5.11)% and(15.09±5.02)% respectively in control group;the JOA scores were(12.03±1.58),(19.81±1.28),(21.86±1.69)and(25.86±1.62)respectively in observation group,and those were(12.05±1.52),(19.66±1.3),(21.95±1.41)and(25.68±1.56)respectively in control group;the LL were(35.75±7.48)°,(41.13±6.86)°,(41.31±6.84)° and(41.74±6.81)° respectively in observation group,and those were(34.02±7.46)°,(38.46±7.08)°,(38.66±7.07)° and(38.96±7.05)°respectively in control group;the intervertebral height of the upper adjacent segment of fusion segment were(9.57±1.38)mm,(11.03±0.87)mm,(10.87±0.84)mm and(10.72±0.83)mm respectively in observation group,and those were(9.55±1.32)mm,(9.41±1.29)mm,(9.22±1.26)mm and(8.93±1.21)mm respectively in control group;the ROM of the upper adjacent segment of fusion segment were(6.98±1.94)°,(6.29±1.9)°,(6.3±1.89)° and(6.41±1.9)° respectively in observation group,and those were(7.03±1.85)°,(7.14±1.84)°,(7.51±1.8)° and(8.52±1.81)° respectively in control group.The VAS scores of leg pain,JOA scores and ODI in both groups were significantly improved at 3 months,6 months after operation and final follow-up compared with those before surgery(P<0.05),with no statistical difference between groups at the same time point,respectively(P>0.05).The VAS scores of back pain in both groups were significantly improved compared with those before surgery(P<0.05),and those in observation group were more significantly improved than those in control group at 3 and 6 months postoperatively,and final follow-up(P<0.05).The LL of the two groups were significantly improved compared with the preoperative one(P<0.05),but there was no statistical difference between two groups at the same time point(P>0.05).At final follow-up,the ROM of the upper adjacent segment was not statistically different from that before operation in the fusion segment of observation group(P>0.05),while it was increased in control group compared with that before surgery(P<0.05);the intervertebral height of the upper adjacent segment of fusion segment was increased after operation in observation group(P<0.05),but that in control group was decreased compared with that before surgery(P<0.05).There were statistically significant differences in the Pfirrmann grade of intervertebral disc of the upper adjacent segment of the fusion segment at final follow-up between the two groups(P<0.05).During the follow-up,no patients in either group had serious complications,such as nerve root injury,dural tears,internal fixation system fracture,or displacement of the interbody device.Conclusion:IntraSPINE non-fusion technique combined with TLIF can achieve satisfactory early outcomes in the treatment of double-segment LDD,more significantly improve low back pain than TLIF,and delay ASD in early stage.
Keywords/Search Tags:Lumbar degenerative disease, IntraSPINE, Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, Adjacent segment degeneration
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
Comparison Of The Adjacent Segment Degeneration And Surgical Outcomes Of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion In Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
Comparisons Of Dynesys Stabilization And Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion For L4/5 Segment Lumbar Degenerative Disease- MRI Index For The Evaluation Of Early Adjacent Disc Degeneration
Comparison Of Short-term Effects Of Oblique Lateral Approach And Interbody Fusion With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion For Single-segment Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
Radiological Spino-pelvic Parameters In Lumbar Degenerative Disease After PLIF And TLIF
Application And Discussion Of Lumbar Fusion Techniques In Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
Use The Step Pretreatment Quantitative Score Table Of Adjacent Segment Before Fusion To Assess Posterior Dynamic Stabilization And Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion For The Treatment Of Single-segment Lumbar Degenerative Disease
Clinical And Radiological Outcomes Of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion In The Treatment Of Lumbar Disease:Minimum Five-year Follow Up
Comparative Analysis Of Adjacent Segment Degeneration After OLIF Versus TLIF
Study On The Correlation Between Adjacent Segment Degeneration And The Number Of Lumbar Fusion Segments After Lumbar Fusion Surgery
10 The Clinical Efficacy Of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined With Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy In The Treatment Of Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Lumbar Surgery