| In recent years,with the development of economic strength,the economic cooperation between China and other countries has being closer and closer,and related policies such as the "Belt and Road" have also attracted many foreigners to China for the purpose of business communication.The number of Chinese learners continues to increase.In order to meet the growing demand for business Chinese learning,a large number of courses and teaching materials related to business Chinese learning have emerged one after another,but the quality varies.This paper takes "Business Chinese Intermediate Course" and "Business Chinese Advanced Course" as the objects,and makes a statistical analysis from the number of vocabulary,grade,recurrence,arrangement and annotation of new words,business vocabulary in textbooks,and vocabulary practice.The following conclusions are:(1)The number of vocabulary in each lesson in the intermediate course is large,and the fluctuations between courses are large;(2)The intermediate course has more advanced and super-class vocabulary;the vocabulary difficulty of the advanced course is lower than intermediate course;(3)There are no examples of related words given in these two books,and the explanation is inaccurate;(4)The repetition of vocabulary in intermediate course is better than advanced course,but the advanced course is more scientific in terms of the repetition of vocabulary in practice;(5)The proportion of business Chinese vocabulary in the intermediate course is low,which cannot meet the needs of learners;(6)The vocabulary practice in the intermediate course does not highlight the characteristics of business vocabulary;the vocabulary exercise in the advanced course has a single type.In general,this paper is supposed to analyze the "Business Chinese Intermediate Course" and "Business Chinese Advanced Course" by combining the "International Chinese Language Education Level Standards" and "Business Chinese Common Vocabulary" to find out how these two textbooks are written and combining the research results of predecessors,providing suggestions for other textbook editors;at the same time,it points out the shortcomings of the textbooks in the compilation,and proposes suggestions for improvement. |