Special Research On Huang Zongxi's Literary Criticis

After Q ian Q ianyi,Huang Zongxi dominated the literary circle in the early Q ing Dynasty.People even rated him as the master who could save the way of literature.Huang Zongxi also trusted his posthumous name to the Confucian scholars.Huang Zongxi not only created a large number of literary works,but also edited and selected the Ming Confucianism Case which summed up the academic changes of the generation and the selected works The Plaintext Case and the Plaintext Sea which reflected the literary development of the Ming Dynasty with extensive knowledge.Compared with the discussion of Huang Zongxi’s philosophy and history,the study of his literary criticism is still weak in the academic circle.Therefore,this paper will focus on Huang Zo ngxi’s literary criticism and analyze its theoretical characteristics in order to supplement the study of Huang Zongxi’s literary theory.This paper intends to make a preliminary study of Huang Zongxi’s literary criticism.In the introduction part of this paper,the value and significance of the topic are discussed,and relevant research status in the academic circle is combed and analyzed to determine the research object of this paper.The text is divided into three chapters: the first chapter mainly discusses the theoretical basis of Huang Zongxi’s literary criticism.When Huang Zongxi discusses the relationship between scene and scene,he pays more attention to the leading role played by the subject’s personal emotion,and thinks that the external scene is not a pure objective thing,but becomes the core of the work together with the subject after enriching the subject’s emotional experience.In order to achieve this state,Huang Zongxi made a definite definition of "temperament",and believed that only the ultimate man and the eternal temperament could appreciate the realm of situational interaction.The second is the theory of plaintext authenticity put forward by Huang Zongxi.Based on the review of Ming Dynasty literature,Huang Zongxi listed the list o f writers in line with his literary ideas and regarded them as plaintext authenticity.Huang Zongxi’s evaluation of literary ideas mainly consists of the following three points: first,the importance of the study of classics and history,second,the importance of innovation,and finally,the importance of emotion.The third is Huang Zongxi’s theory of literary atmosphere.Huang Zongxi developed the theory of Q i treatise and introduced it into the field of human treatise.Huang Zongxi’s theory of culture and Q i is characterized by profound legacy and unique characteristics of The Times.The second chapter discusses the stylistic consciousness embodied in Huang Zongxi’s literary criticism,which is divided into two parts: historical texts and stele texts.Huang Zongxi thought that the writing style of historical biography should first uphold the spirit of traditional historical biography at the ideological level,not empty beauty nor hidden evil.Secondly,the text does not adulterate other body;Finally,we should pay attention to commendatory and derogatory opinions,in order to correct people’s hearts and distinguish right from wrong,so as to achieve economic and social goals.Huang Zongxi generally adopted strict rules for the style of inscription.A more relaxed standard of writing.Take appropriate ways to express your feelings without confusing stylistic boundaries.Therefore,Huang Zongxi formulated such works as the Example of the Stone and Stone,and at the same time,he had the courage to reform in his own creation,expand the theme of expression,break the writing formula,and inject new vitality into the development of inscription on tablets.The third chapter discusses the realistic problems in Huang Zongxi’s literary criticism.O n the one hand,Hua ng Zongxi wanted to change the style of literature and then the style of scholars by changing the style of literature.O n the other hand,in order to maintain the orthodox position of Confucianism,he criticized other thoughts.The conclusion points out the value of Huang Zongxi’s literary criticism.