Font Size: a A A

Responses Of The Distribution And Involved Process Of Soil Water, Carbon, Nitrogen, And Phosphorus To Vegetation Types In The Wind-water Erosion Region

Posted on:2011-02-17Degree:DoctorType:Dissertation
Country:ChinaCandidate:X L FuFull Text:PDF
GTID:1103360308455093Subject:Soil science
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
The transitional belt with both water and wind erosion is the center of the intensive erosion and subject to severe vegetation degradation. The wind-water erosion region is characterized by dramatic change of climate and quite heterogeneous soil substrate, suffering wind and/or water erosion through the year. Such unique and harsh habitat quality indicates that the performance of vegetation restoration in eco-environmental serve, e.g. remedy soil and water erosion, improve soil fertility and ecosystem carbon sequestration, in the wind-water erosion region should be different from the other parts of the Loess plateau. In 2007-2009 years, experiments were conducted in Shenmu Erosion and Environment Research Station of the Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS&WRR to study the dynamic temporal and spatial distribution of four biogenic elements (water, carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus), vegetation evapotranspiration, soil respiration and plant photosynthesis rate, and their responses to four vegetation types (shrub, grass, fallow and cropland). The main results are:1. Vegetation types changed the soil moisture distribution and water balance on the hillslopes. The soil moisture distribution was uniform along the hillslopes for shrub and grass. However, soil water storage to 4 m depth for fallow and cropland showed a water lateral movement driven by the topography. The evapotranspiration order of four vegetation types was shrub > grass > cropland > fallow. At the beginning of the rain season (June), the evapotranspiration from shrub and grass were quite larger than the precipitation. The slope scale in length mainly influenced the runoff.2. The performances in soil quality recovery were quite different among vegetation types. Compared with the cropland, shrub directly increased soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in the 0-100 cm soil depth, however, grass and fallow could indirectly improve soil organic carbon and nitrogen by decreasing sediments losses and runoff. The effect of vegetation types was not significant on soil total phosphorus concentration but pronounced on soil total phosphorus distribution along the hillslopes. A downward accumulation trend of soil total phosphorus along the hillslope was observed for fallow and cropland. Pronounced influences of vegetation types on the temporal and spatial variability of soil available phosphorus and inorganic nitrogen were detected. Soil available phosphorus of shrub, grass and fallow was consistently lower than that of cropland. However, the order of soil inorganic nitrogen between shrub, grass, fallow and cropland varied with season. In contrast to cropland, soil available phosphorus was higher in August and had no downward accumulation along the hillslopes for shrub, grass and fallow. During the study period, the dominant form of soil inorganic nitrogen for shrub and grass changed frequently, however, the dominant form was NH4+-N and NO3--N for fallow and cropland, respectively. Soil inorganic nitrogen distributed randomly along the hillslopes for shrub and fallow but had downward accumulation trend in certain months for grass and cropland. Besides, fertilizer derived nitrogen leaching was at risk in this semiarid rainfed agriculture ecosystem.3. Vegetation phonological stage mediated the effects of vegetation types on daytime and monthly soil respiration. The soil respiration variation amplitude of fallow and cropland was comparable to that of shrub and grass in July but obviously larger than that of shrub and grass in August and October. During the study period, monthly soil respiration of fallow and cropland were comparable and significantly lower than that of shrub and grass, with an exception in August when soil respiration of cropland was as larger as shrub and grass. The main controlling factor of monthly soil respiration variation differed among vegetation types, e.g. soil temperature highly mediated the monthly soil respiration variation for the three vegetation types but contributed little when went to the cropland. The biotic factors, root biomass, leaf area index and photosynthesis rate, are mainly responsible for the monthly differences in soil respiration among vegetation types. Moreover, the dominant controlling factor varied with vegetation stage.4. Rock fragments changed the rain pulse characteristics and the level of soil respiration during the rain season. Rock fragment layer delayed the rain pulse peak of soil respiration, and the delay duration increased with the increase of rainfall. Average soil respiration during the study period was significantly lower than the control because of the lower root biomass and different rain pulse properties. Rock fragment coverage showed a significant effect on soil respiration following rainfall but had no influence on rain pulse rhythm of soil respiration. Soil respiration of the treatment mixed with rock fragment was quite lower than that of control. Effect of rock fragment coverage and content on average soil respiration of the study period was not significant. Additionally, rock fragment did not change the seasonal variation of soil respiration.5. Compared with fallow, shrub and grass had better performance in carbon sequestration. Vegetation restoration improved the carbon sequestration and photosynthetic C uptake of the vegetation in a small watershed with the area of 20 hm2. Vegetation restoration in this small watershed annually increased photosynthetic carbon uptake and carbon sequestration with the values of 25 and 2.2 Mg C, respectively.The results showed that shrub performed better than grass in improving soil nutrient content. The large carbon emission caused by soil respiration of shrub and grass was offset by the corresponding large photosynthetic carbon uptake. Therefore, the small watershed involved with vegetation restoration program served as carbon sink. Soil water deficit at the beginning of the rain season aggravated the soil desiccation of planting perennial vegetations. However, this problem would be alleviated by adopting instructive spatial distribution pattern of vegetation types. Because urea-derived nitrogen loss by leaching was at risk in the agroecosystem, optimized fertilizer management should be adopted instead of the traditional extensive style. The result that rock fragment significantly changed the rain pulse properties and rain season mean value of soil respiration suggests that considering soil heterogeneous is important in terrestrial ecosystem carbon emission. The conclusions of this study can be used to evaluate the eco-environmental performance of the vegetation restoration program in the wind-water erosion region and be beneficial in constructing effective management of eco-environment restoration.
Keywords/Search Tags:biogenic element, temporal and spatial distribution, biogeochemical cycling, vegetation type, wind-water erosion region
PDF Full Text Request
Related items