Approaching The Intersubjectivitical Understanding

The history sduty not only wants certain some historical facts, but also needs to deduce the historical significances from the historical events, or give the significances to the historical facts. Also is to say, we still need to carry on the understanding to the historical facts. So, how have we carried on the historical understanding? In traditional historical research, the people all guard securely a conviction that the actor of the historical consigns to have"original intention"(meaning) in the historical events doubtlessly. Then it wants to let historical events say what, expression what. The modern people's understanding to the history with the neutral attitude expels the prejudice of various misunderstanding to result in, go to reconstruct original meaning world of the historical activity completely.Actually, in the process of historical understanding, the active power that understanding is not decided by understanding, but is from the interplay with the understanding be placed in the different circumstances and the historical objects.Also ,the historical understanding become through" the horizon fusing" by the horizon of understander and the horizon of historical objects. The" horizon fusing" outruns the boundary and the tops of now to arrive in the past, also outran the past boundary but extend till now. Any historical understanding to be subjected by two basic aspects, that is to say, is subjected to the aspect understanding and supervision of the historical facts. The visual field that understanding rules to actor of understandin, ruled to the degree of the historical understanding.But the historical objects then rules to the basic target of understanding and objective contents of understanding. So, the historical understanding is not to try hard to attain to rebuild" the history original intention" objectively, but is the horizon fusing and output" the result history", also is to say that the historical significance is the understanding medium borning" the third party".Everybody will become the different historical culture contact with the different historical culture traditionally.And everybody's life experience does not fulfils same alike, again become the ways of this kind of historical contact on the personality for possess singly. But everybody has understood the past character with own special experience, occupied an individuality that others can't replace or match completely. The process of understanding wants to depend on the horizon and the ability that it open owns, the biggest degree ground accept him the horizon of hermeneutic object. So, the historical understanding has the particular historical environment, the historical condition and the historical positions, the results that historical understanding has the situatal condition and opposites.So, will the understanding that has the different historical situation facing the same historical facts attain the consistency of the understanding? Traditional solution, regardless the substantial doctrine, the historism still the hermeneutic, all hope to pass the substantial evidence method, re-perform in mental or distinct prujudice of understanding, attained universally validity of the understanding. In fact, these methods are all the angle of view of the individualism essentially. In other words, they are all from the individual to see the history, have no in consideration of the existence without other understanding. And hope the universally human nature to assurance individual of different to the same validity. But, the assumption of the common human nature and objective spirit is just prepare of a kind of metaphysics to establish, Only can't guarantee that own understanding from the individual angle of view have the validity of others. The understanding of the individual should to head for the diversal subjects by all means, namely the intersubjectivitical historical understanding.Be a kind of social existence thing, whichever understanding all impossibly exists and stands alonely. Also is to say, the existence of the whichever understanding includes others necessarily with his similar existence. So, the real understanding activity only has in social association relation between others, at the admitting and respect of the other party mutually just may exist. Each individual take ego as the first must make the other party be the subjects to some extent again at the same time. Also, that is not" an individual" as the dissident, but the subject of interaction at foundation of social association completely .In other words, the horizon individual understanding owns the intersubjectiviticial dimension insidely. In historical understanding process, the ego understanding wants to be cognitied by the own oneself and common understand objective supervision of these two dimensions at the same time. Many understanding discovered the others and the ego-self in understand process. Thus no longer limit to the ego for the center of the narrow and small scope inside, but jump to come into the extensive understanding realm those others together. So, the historical understanding in the process can understand from the angle of the other party then and every moment, present the angle and position of views to the other party, then acquiring understanding and communication mutually.To attain universally validity of the historical understanding, we should to master the acknowledgement and accept and enjoy the difference understanding, being harmony with antinomy, solving the conflict. In the process of historical understanding, any understanding can't any others in eyes, but must affirm the position of the respect others at the same time, affirm"the others" to have correspond the right, position and dignities. Many understanding only at foundation communicate mutually in many ways, and then can carry out the dissimilarity understanding to see the horizon with dissimilarity mutually.After experiencing the horizon differently, we can see largely to re- hold the historical object in the horizon, namely ,so-called the larger scope of" the horizon fusing", thus attain" consensus" between corpuses. Also is to say, the historical understanding have to pass to hand over with each other turns to carry out the universally validity, the exactly individual understanding intersubjectical conversion is the process of a consistency. So say, practicing an intersbjectivitical dimension on the foundation the association exactly, just guaranteeing that the people'understanding have the astringency and restricts, thus guaranteeing the result of understanding have the orderly, norm, and consistency.