Font Size: a A A

A Research On Development And Governance Of China's University Science Park

Posted on:2012-09-16Degree:DoctorType:Dissertation
Country:ChinaCandidate:W L ChenFull Text:PDF
GTID:1117330368486199Subject:Industrial Economics
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
China's University Science and Technology Park (HEREINAFTER referred as "University Science Park"), acknowledged by an increasing number of people, has been playing the role of an innovator and a leader since its birth. Now that it is new, many controversies and problems arise as it grows. It is also a subject that scholars and builders have made great efforts exploring and discussing. As a result, diversified ideas have been developed.This paper attempts to put forth original opinions on some unsolved practical problems that need to be taken care of, based on comprehensive study on the theory, referring to years of experience in typical University Science Park management and research achievements contributed by domestic and overseas experts and scholars. Relevant research has been carried out according to systems theory and theory of national innovation system, following 2 approaches:one is to collect, analyze and study literature and data, comparing theories and opinions of different scholars and experts, to keep pace with leading edge of scientific research; the other is to conduct on-the-spot investigation and face-to-face interviews after "512 Sichuan Earthquake" during reconstruction in the institute for which the author is working, aiming to clarify current situation of University Science Park and point out existing problems.The paper firstly redefines the concepts such as "University Science Park" and "Managing and Governing", focusing on the basic theories of "Innovation System", "Three-Party Participation" and "Incubator". Then it explores the experiences provided by advanced countries and newly-developed nations and discusses their reference value for China. For the third step, it evaluates the development of University Science Park and the existing situation of Park Governing, introducing its history, with respect to the strengths and the weaknesses, as well as the internal cause for governing impediment. And then it analyzes and studies the hottest as well as the hardest terms in building the Park, such as Strategy Governing Policy, Organization Pattern Governing, Capital Operation, Risk Prevention and Innovation. And as the final step, it presents policy suggestions based on the three layers of government, university and intermediate organization. Theories applied in this paper come from Industrial Economics, Advanced Economics, Information Economics, Investment and Finance Principles, Regional Economics, Managerial Economics and so on, assisted by a variety of methods as Deduction, Comparison, System Analysis, Induction, and Decision Objects Hierarchy Analysis.The main achievements and conclusions are listed as following:(1) The concept of risk management for the University Science Park is initially brought up, which, to some extent, contribute to promoting the innovation in management for the University Science Park.(2) An analysis framework is created, known as the "six-party" governing policy for the University Science Park. For the first time it is clarified that campus policy is a matter of "governing" and the execution of the policy is a matter of "managing". The essence of campus governing is especially illustrated to gain preliminary theoretical research achievement.(3) The paper involves a new analytic attempt to come up with 4 basic governing statuses by practicing, investigating and concluding, which are "Fit-in Governance", "Unyielding Governance", "Obscure Governance", "Political Governance".(4) The paper also analyzes the diversification in information, education and business of University Science Park and draws a new conclusion that multi-cultures should be formed in University Science Park, with corporate culture as the lead, campus culture and regional culture as the root, and experiences of advanced international parks as reference.(5) A judgment is made based on adequate data and analysis that integrated evaluation is less mature for current University Science Park than single evaluation which seems more reasonable. Meanwhile, mathematical methods have been respectively used to test the strategic points in University Science Park project, with an illustration on its methods, principles and precautions it requires.
Keywords/Search Tags:university science park, developing and governing, strategy pattern, risk prevention, policy suggestion
PDF Full Text Request
Related items