Philosophy Of Creation Process In The Perspective Of Creation Studies

With the establishment of the creation value, creation, and therefore has become China’s modern tradition, and thus has become a hot topic in various fields. Throughout the research results of the modern creativity theory in domestic and foreign, those studies have different perspectives, but there is a series of problems. First, the research field is mostly focused on psychology and engineering, creatology mostly stayed in the practical level under the impact and penetration of the social utilitarian thought. It focused on the creation engineering and the application of creative techniques, failed to produce the deep and important changes of the "metaphysical", caused people only pay attention to invention, not talk about the creation. The creation process theory is more utilitarian and much less cultural spirit, presents a fragmented state between technology and humanity. Second, creation theories were based on East or West culture background and their different thinking mode, There was a separation and opposition of create views, between the East and the West. Third, the research of creation process from the philosophical perspective was ignored. There was a lack of system and necessary philosophical reflection and questioning for the creation process, creation process still tended to be a black box. Fourth, the traditional philosophy research model was fragmentation, static, and lack of the whole, dynamic research on the creation process due to the intrinsic complexity of the process itself, the research history on the creation process was quite short, so creation process theory was still very immature, and need a continuous development.Creation studies are an open-ended and extensible concept, which is advanced based on Zhang Dainian’s comprehensive innovation cultural views. In order to promote it further, the Creation studies needs to study the creation process starting from the philosophy in the communication between Chinese and Western, In view of this, this thesis took "creation process" as the main line, a comprehensive analysis of domestic and foreign creativity theory research were presented under the guidance of Creation studies, which compromised the traditional and modern, creativity view of the East and the West, technology and humanities. And the present situation and the existence question were discussed by comparison and blending approach, the creation process was analysized and positioned from the perspective of Creation Studies. The research overcome the traditional microscopic or macroscopic definition pattern in which the creative subject, creation results, creative thinking process and other aspects of creative practice were cut from each other. The system and complete creation process theory was proposed in the paper, and the create methods, knowledge, rules, and pursuit of realm were set as a whole.First, from the view of methodology, the paper was very revealing about the evolution process of creation methods:the previous creative techniques era (era of no method)——the era of creative techniques (creative techniques were put forward and were spread widely)——the era of post-creative techniques (TRIZ theory was prevailing)——the era of methodology without technique and skill (no fixed method and beyond the traditional creative techniques), the evolution process of creation method is a negation of negation. From the background of Chinese and Western culture, the paper put forward "The way of creation" as the core, and realized transience from the logical methods to no scientific method by comparing the TRIZ methods and Chinese traditional cultural background "Methodology without technique and skill".Second, from recognition viewpoint, the primary and secondary questions of the creation process were revealed."In my view", the thesis analyzed the creation subject’s thinking and understanding during the all creation process."In the view of objects", the evolution of law and knowledge of creation object were revealed in this paper. Comprehensive the two aspects,"in the view of Tao", the epistemological question of creation process was discussed deeply, from the view of "Objects and I are the whole"; the theory and practice method was put forward based on the knowledge and creator. The paper had deep analysis on TRIZ theory from perspective of the epistemological of dialectical materialism. A dialectic view of creation was revealed to promote the unified understanding between creation practice and philosophy.Third, from the theory of value and the thought of realm, this paper reflected on the similarities and differences of the value pursuit and creation realm in Chinese and Western, the dynamic unity of man and nature integrated with "Tao" and "IFR" was presented, and the interaction between the epistemology, methodology and axiology of innovation process was discussed from theory and practice, which enabled them to move away from the "fragmentation" state toward the system and integrity, and which can achieve the effective interaction between the three.Fourth, the basic way of "The way of creation" was discussed from the perspective of practical philosophy, and with the "know the noumenon to reach the highest realm " as the purpose, the paper explored the practical method of Creation studies, such as "knowledge and practice live together","thinking and practice live together" and "Inheritance and creation live together". The localization process of TRIZ guided with "Creation Studies" and the future development of "Creation Studies" was discussed.The system philosophy of creation process is not only methodology, but also epistemology and axiology. Creation process of macro level should be a more multidimensional and integrated existence. The purpose of the paper is not to prove it as a process of creation, but to describe the process in the lead of "Creation Studies ". In the paper, the process was analysized and revealed which can provide a new way for the modern development of Creatology, and also provide a new perspective for the construction in eastern and western philosophy.