Research On The Legislation Of Chinese Pharmacists

At present, the problem of irrational drug use is widespread, drug-related security incidents occur frequently. Due to our current lack of the special law of pharmacist, pharmacists have difficult in playing a role in the safety of drug use. According to the latest legislative plan of the State Council in 2016, Pharmacist Law is listed as the fourth class research project. Strengthen the work of pharmacist legislation, promote the role of the pharmacy service transformation has become an important problem to be solved in the pharmaceutical and legal field.Some experts have been fully aware of the urgency and necessity of pharmacist law in China, and put forward the basic framework and main content of the law. But the existing research focuses on the framework of the pharmacist law and direct legislative proposals and epistemological analysis of the feasibility and necessity. The research of the stage and the role of pharmacists, legal relationship, basic ideas and disputes and legislative suggestions are inadequate. The research adopts the combined method of theory and practice, logical reasoning and summarized combining, including literature research, comparative analysis, qualitative interviews and discussion, attempts to construct the comprehensive, systematic pharmacists law suitable for the situation of our country.The research firstly analyzes the role of origin and evolution of domestic and foreign pharmacists profession. It is believed that the international professional pharmacists have gotten through traditional pharmaceutical development stage, clinical pharmaceutical development stage, and pharmaceutical practice development stage. However, the role of pharmacist in our country is still in the transition period from traditional pharmaceutical care to clinical pharmaceutical services. So our country needs to promote the transformation of the role of pharmacists to pharmaceutical practice through legislation.Internationally, the role of the pharmacist has been recognized, and the most important point is the protection of legal system. This research compares the current international legal system of pharmacists, and summarizes the legislative model into three categories:The first category is the model of pharmacy law, represented by the United States, which can define the role of pharmacists and pharmacists practicing in the field of positioning. The second category is the mode of pharmacist law, represented by Japan and Taiwan area of China, which is in accordance with the general management of the main body, such as the qualification examination, registration system, the duty of pharmacists, continue education, legal responsibility. The third category is the model of the pharmacist registration law, represented by the UK and Singapore, which mainly reflects the content of registered pharmacists, and pharmacist qualification examination called registered competency test or registration evaluation testCompared with the international pharmacists legal system, our specialized pharmacists law always lack. At present, pharmaceutical personnel in China is divided into two categories:a class is administrative departments of hospital pharmacists system; another is licensed pharmacists system. There exist differences in the two types of pharmacists in the subject of management, personnel equipped with, certified, duties and powers, continuing education etc. So the research thinks that we must solve the existing problems of the double track system of. Pharmacists.The research suggests that we must clarify the theoretical basis of pharmacist legislation firstly. The jurisprudence foundation of the pharmacist legislation is to ensure the realization of citizen’s health right, the ethical foundation is to promote the pharmacist’s profession morality, social law foundation lies in resolving the growing conflict between public social demand on security administration and the shortage of pharmacist and inadequate competent in pharmaceutical care. In addition, the basic idea of balance theory should be carried out in legislation.Based on the above theoretical analysis, the research put forward specific proposals of China’s legislative system:the study pharmacist pharmacists legislation should take the name of Pharmacist Law; the role of pharmacists should be positioned in the pharmaceutical retail and use areas to provide pharmacy services for patients; the establishment specialized pharmacists commissions, including the appropriate examination Committee, specialist pharmacists Committee, registration Committee, continuing education committees etc. promote the role of Pharmacists Association, and pharmacists must join pharmacists Association; the implementation of pharmacist assistant system, and it shall not replace pharmacists equipped; improve the access threshold for eligibility, and strengthen the qualification of existing pharmacy technicians and traditional pharmacists national; the implementation of practicing and non-practicing registration filing system; the implementation of system of part-time pharmacist, pharmacists should not apply the multi-sited licensed; the highlight of the special rights and special obligations, and core right is Pharmacist service fee, core obligation is responsibility; pharmacists legislation may require only the basic principles of pharmacists responsibilities, and then develop the detailed operational implementation Details by the Chinese pharmacists Association; authenticate the continuing education institutions, and improve the continuing education credits; the administrative and administrative body relative liability.