Actor And Structure-a Study On Marx’s Social Formation Evolution Dynamic Theory

The logical starting of research is the definition of the core concepts. Based on the core concept of "Marx’s Social Formation Evolution Dynamic Theory", the paper will try to carry out the analysis of the times and the origin of "Marx’s Social Formation Evolution Dynamic Theory" in-depth.In the paper, auther will take full advantage of the methods of "Hermeneutics" and "New Cultural History".under so, the "integrity" of "Marx’s Social Formation Evolution Dynamic Theory" was analyzed. On the basis of the analysis, Author will abstract two dynamical forms of Social Formation Evolution. Namely "Active Dynamic" and "Structural Dynamic" The evolution of social forms of "Structural Dynamic" is the description of social formation evolution under the influence of Historical Matarialism; "Active Dynamic" is an active powe to promote the social and historical evolution. Its dynamic mechanism is "practise". Only under the incentive of the "Active Dynamic", the socical formation will began to change. In a class society, it embodies "Class War"Between the "Structural Dynamic" and the "Active Dynamic". There is the existence of conflict, namely "freedom" and "existence", "dynamic" and "rule", "hidden" and "dominant".and they exist the tension each other, The tension embody the conflict of scientism and humanism, rationality and inrationlity. This tension had led to endlessly debate over one hundred years in the history of communism movement. And it can be divided into "Activism Group" and "Scientism Group", the former indirectly consider the "Actor" as the initiative power that drive society change, the latter considers the objective regulation as the power to enchance development of social history.This study attempts to produce a new "Activism" under the foundation of the analysis of the tension, according to different understanding in the international communist movement one hundred year ago. From the perspective of the "practice", author rethinks the relationship between the "Actor" and "structure". And try to rebuild a new theoretical framework, and it is as follows:Under the foundation of "live world", Human’s "experience" desires will let the complex "human beam" evolve into "Social Formation". And the "practical mechanism" is "strengthen" or "learn". And in this way, we try to bridge the interaction of "individual" and "structure". In the process of practice between human and environment, human nature began to evolve inro static dynamic form of society. All in all, in order to realize the reconstruction of the relationship between human nature and social structure. Author makes full use of the Marx’s core concepts such as "actor", "practice". And the paper’s final purpose, in addition to bridge the conflict between "Structural Dynamic" and "Activism Dynamic", is going to construct the edition 3.0 of Social Formation Evolution Theory.