Reconstruct The Rising Strategy Path Under The Background Of The Anarchical Cultures Transformation

If the hegemonic maintenance makes the core issue of American internationalrelations theory, so the rise strategy of the great powers makes the core issue in today’sinternational relations theory of China. This study is intended to point out that theinteraction between the rise and hegemony countries not only depends on the structuralof power, and more depends on the interaction of body’s system of power under theinfluence of culture and its relationship between construction and the process ofevolution. The evolution of the system culture may led to a new role between the units,The evolution of the role between the units could cause the change of interest cognitive,Interests cognitive shifts might trigger unit interaction between logic and behaviorpatterns change, In turn affects the ways and means of the great powers’ rise strategicchoice. To demonstrate the rationality of the logical context, and explore “the logic ofreal” and the correlation between "historical truth", the core assumptions has been putforward, through the logical form the basic hypothesis, and based on which, a collectionof hypothesis will be form a theoretical framework,through using the historical data toverify theoretical validity probability, finally made a conclusion on the basis of the data.According to the context, the full text is divided into six chapters.Chapter1：This chapter has mainly defined the boundary of the basic conceptionsand the therary interpretation. Through the definition of the concept and theory ofapplicable category, this paper distinguishes between the system culture and subsystem culture of the existence of common basic facts. This distinction shows that the systemculture and subsystem culture are the two different analysis layer,and we can’t usesystem cultural to disprove the subsystem cultural level. Secondly, by reference to theEnglish school and Minnesota school,this paper also think that anarchy cultural of theinternational community can be divides into three kinds. With long history in thischapter the focal length to the modern history of international relations in the past fourhundred, the international system is emphatically discussed culture exists along severalpossible? Whether changes took place in the system of culture? Why the cultures ofsystems change? What is the direction of the system cultural change? How to make areasonable explanation to the reverse cases? For all above problems in the research andinterpretation constituted in this paper shows the main vein of the chapter1”"understanding system culture structure changes: theory and history".Chapter2: This chapter has mainly to locate the system cultures of internationalpolitical operation since the post-cold war era. In this section, different from Bull andWent,with the changes of the international node standard, more details of system culturedivision has been taken. On lok system culture internalization between the main body ofthe three stages of development is an innovation of this article. State from thelongitudinal, system culture of Lockean can be divided into "formation stage","development stage","mature" and "advanced" stage. With the increase of Lockeanculture capacity, international politics is experiencing from the "power politics" and"social Darwinism","natural selection model" and "the law of the jungle" to "form ofequality","procedural justice" and "cultural choice" and "mutual recognition" sovereignsurvival. At the same time, relying on military power grab the interests of the statepower politics thought and means and dominated by international community nowadaysthere is an obvious deviation from cultural and moral consensus.At the influence ofLockean culture,we are experiencing the zero death of the sovereign countrys, and the international community interaction model also changed after the cold war,new changeshave taken place in characterized by three features: first, the "culture choosing" modeinstead of the "natural selection"; Second, the "market allocation" mode instead of the"authority allocation" mode; Third, the " configurative wars " instead of the "constitutive wars” mode. For all the issues above makes the the main parts of the secondchapter "The dominant system culture of international and whose influence after thecold war ".Chapter3: This chapter mainly discusses the change of the dominate strategic goalofthe rise power under the Lockean culture. System culture decided to the logic of theinteraction between subject and role cognition,and then to determine the comprehensionof the interests. Under the different system cultures, there exist differences in nationalinterests on the urgency and importance of sorts. Hobbes system culture pay attention tothe security interests which based on survival, Lockean culture pay attention to theeconomic interests which based on welfare, and Kant system culture pay attention to thefate community interest which based on identity. In determining the dominant culturalchange and international system has entered a higher society which can go beyond thepower of "fear" competition stage. Through the comprehensive investigation of theinternational system，which can be divided as "structural variables","process variable"and "relational variables", this section attempts to process, from the perspective of the"relational variables to solve a single" structural variables "analysis framework mayconclude unable to eliminate or reduce the rise and hegemony countries politicaltragedy between traditional conclusion. Mainly discusses the concept of change andstandardize reconstruction under the premise of the rise and hegemony countriesbetween whether to exist due to lower survival and security interests urgency ofmoderate competitive power and the possibility of a zero-sum game logic. For all the issues above makes the whole patt of the chapter3” The logic between the systemcultural change and the development of the rise power’s mainly strategic targets ".Chapter4:This part mainly disscusses the “Reconstruction of the rising path underthe background of the dominant strategy target evolution”. The system cultural changeleds the evolution of the strategic objectives, which leads the strategic of the rising path,and ultimately affects the process of the rise of great powers:easy success or justfailure.Mr.Yaqing Qin thinks that:” In the mature period of Lockean culture, thehighest interests are not surrive for a sovereign country. On the contrary, the minimumrequirement is the survival.” For the emerging countries,they are not only faced with thehistorical experience’s "drive", also faces to create peace thought’s "guide" in the future."Historical truth" and the “logical of real” intersection separation in the inheritance andchange, and to form the bases of researching the change of strategy of the rising powers.Since it has been harder to fetch the interests for state by military,and may cause acountry face greater cost and political risk, even bring damage to status and reputationfor the rising power.The means for a country to accumulate international influencegradually shifted from military victories to economic competitiveness for ascending,abide by and promote the implementation of the international common norms. By thestudy of the system culture and the dominant standard after the cold war we find thatthe traditional "safe self-help strategy" has faced the dilemma of era, and the "securityof a lift with the push responsibility strategy" may have a larger operational space forthe rising countries.In this situation,the choice of self-banding as a " nonmilitarystrategy" seems not only feasible, but also have a significantly lower cost and risk forthe rising countries if whose rising strategy path changing from the”meta-powerbehavior”to the “relational power behavior”. The research and interpretation mentionedabove constituted the mainly parts of the chapter4,which could be titled as " Reconstruction of the rising strategy path under the background of the dominant targetevolution ".Chapter5: This main purposes of this chapter is to examine the statistics and causalanalysis which mentioned in the previous chapters in the purpose of judging whether thetheory of hypothesis is ture or not. Specific select the case of Germany,Japan, theUnited States and the Soviet union whiche can be seen as successively rise in theinternational system since1866to analyst the proposition:"The relations betweenstrategic choice and the success or failure for the rising countries". Proposed inspectionsamples cover the Germany1866-1990, the Japan1866-1987, the United States1866-1991,and the Soviet union1866-1991. Concrete is divided into three periods: casevalidation1: Japan and Germany (1866-1914); Case validation2: Germany, Japan andthe Soviet union (1919-1939); Case validation3: Germany, Japan and the Soviet union(1945-1991).Chapter6:The conclusion of this research. This chapter mainly divided into twoparts. The first part of content is "the conclusion of this paper and the promotion of thehypothesis ". The first part mainly points out the finally conclusion, and the furtherproblems that exist in the process of reflection which has not been solved by myresearch but could be paid more attention in the future research; The second part ismainly based on the conclusion of the study, and points out what could be a betterstrategy path for a rising country such as China,and points specific methods on how tobuild a new type of power relations between China and the United States.