| To address issues surrounding improved automotive fuel economy, an experiment was designed to study the effect of uniaxial plastic tensile deformation on surface roughness and on slip and grain rotation. Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and scanning laser confocal microscopy (SLCM) were used to track grain size, crystallographic texture, and surface topography as a function of incremental true strain for a coarse-grained binary alloy that is a model for AA5xxx series aluminum alloys. One-millimeter thick sheets were heat treated at 425°C to remove previous rolling texture and to grow grains to sizes in the range ∼10-8000 mum. At five different strain levels, 13 sample regions, containing 43 grains, were identified in both EBSD and SLCM micrographs, and crystallographic texture and surface roughness were measured. After heat treatment, a strong cube texture matrix emerged, with bands of generally non-cube grains embedded parallel to the rolling direction (RD). To characterize roughness, height profiles from SLCM micrographs were extracted and a filtered Fourier transform approach was used to separate the profiles into intergranular (long wavelength) and intragranular (short wavelength) signatures.;The commonly-used rms roughness parameter (Rq) characterized intragranular results. Two important parameters assess intergranular results in two grain size regimes: surface tilt angle (Deltatheta) and surface height discontinuity (DeltazH) between neighboring grains at a boundary. In general, the magnitude of Rq and Deltatheta increase monotonically with strain and indicate that intergranular roughness is the major contributor to overall surface roughness for true strains up to epsilon = 0.12.;Surface height discontinuity DeltazH is defined due to exceptions in surface tilt angle analyses. The range of observed Deltatheta= 1-10° are consistent with the observed 3-12° rotation of individual grains as measured with EBSD. For some grain boundaries with Deltatheta< 4°, the surface height discontinuity DeltazH characterizes the response of adjacent grains in which one or more are large (∼1000-2000 mum), making a 3-12° rotation of the grain highly unlikely. This can be understood by postulating that the energy associated with rotating large grains would exceed the energy to shear along the boundary. Slip and grain boundary shearing are the active mechanisms in these instances. |
