Font Size: a A A

The effect of different levels of constructive teaching practices on teacher question asking behaviors

Posted on:2007-10-17Degree:Ph.DType:Dissertation
University:The University of IowaCandidate:Erdogan, IbrahimFull Text:PDF
GTID:1447390005975076Subject:Science Education
Abstract/Summary:
The purposes of the study were: (1) to examine the effectiveness of the Iowa Chautauqua Professional Development Program (ICPDP) in moving elementary science teachers toward the use of more constructive teaching practices and (2) to investigate the effectiveness of different levels of teaching practices, especially in terms of a sample of teachers achieving "expert" state at the end of program compared with some attaining only with "competent" level. The variables considered were their perceptions of their own classroom practices, stated philosophy of teaching and learning, and their actual classroom practices and question asking behaviors observed via videotape recording.;Structured questionnaires, focus group interviews, teacher reflections, and examination of lesson modules were used to collect data from thirty-three K-5 in-service teachers who were involved in a one-year ICPDP. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of data revealed that: (1) Teacher perceptions regarding their teaching and learning, and their actual teaching practices in classroom in terms of constructivist approaches were significantly changed after participation in the ICPDP. (2) Teacher perceptions of their classroom practices and stated philosophies of teaching and learning have a great affect on their actual practices that can be observed. (3) Teacher stated philosophies of teaching and learning significantly influence the quantity and quality of their use of questions in their classrooms. (4) The "expert" teachers accept students' alternative answers and deliberately ask high cognitive level questions that enable students to think critically and to guide them based on what the students are thinking. Alternatively, the "competent" teachers do not follow student responses and used questions which do not help students to understand their current level of understanding nor encourage students to reflect on their own thinking. (5) The role of "expert" teacher is more geared toward challenging student ideas stimulated by questions and then allowing students to build their understandings that are affected by the discussion. "Competent" teachers, on the other hand, exhibit a more transmissive approach that lead students to an end that has been previously determined. Such teaching does little to persuade students to use their own thinking.
Keywords/Search Tags:Teaching practices, Teacher, Students, Level
Related items