| Pearl oysters of the genus Pinctada include some economically important species. The taxonomy of some of the species is problematic. Phylogenetic relationship of the species in the genus is also poorly studied. In the present study, phylogenetic relationships of P. chemnitzi, P. fucata, P. margaritifera, P. maxima, P. nigra, P. radiata (from China), P. fucata martensii (from Japan), P. albina and P. imbricata (from Australia) were studied with Pteria penguin as an outgroup, and genetic variation of Chinese P. fucata, Japanese P. fucata martensii and Australian P. imbricata populations were investigated (1) to address the taxonomic confusion and phylogeny of pearl oysters, (2) to understand the genetic connections between the Chinese P. fucata, Japanese P. fucata martensii and Australian P. imbricata in west Pacific and (3) to provide information for the genetic improvement program initiated in China.; The internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) of nuclear ribosomal DNA were compared among the above nine taxa, based on sequences determined by the present study and those available from Genl3ank. The phylogenetic analysis indicates that the pearl oysters studied constitute three clades: clade I with the small oysters P. fucata, P. fucata martensii and P. imbricata, clade II with P. albina, P. nigra, P. chemnitzi and P. radiata, and clade III and clade III with the big pearl oysters P. margaritifera and P. maxima forming the basal clade. Clade II is made up two subclades: clade IIA consisting of P. albina and P. nigra and clade IIB consisting of P. chemnitzi and P. radiata. The topology of the phylogenetic tree and substitution pattern of ITS sequences suggest that P. margaritifera and P. maxima are primitive species and P. chemnitzi is a recent species. The genetic divergences between clades ranged from 28% to 76.5%, and between subclades, 8.7-10.2%. In clade I, the interspecific genetic divergences ranged from 0.6% to 1.4%, and overlapped with interspecific divergences (0.6-1.1%), indicating that P. fucata, P. fucata martensii and P. imbricata may be conspecific. Based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers and ITS sequences from more individuals, analyses of the populations of these three taxa also support the conclusion that Chinese P. fucata, Japanese P. fucata martensii and Australian P. imbricata are the same species, with P. fucata being the correct name. The genetic divergence between P. albina and P. nigra was also very low (1.2%), suggesting that they may represent two subspecies that can only be distinguished by shell color. The genetic divergences between P. maxima and P. margaritifera, and between clade IIA and clade IIB ranged from 8.3% to 10.2%, suggesting that they are closely related, respectively. The ITS1 sequence of P. radiata from GenBank is almost identical to that of P. chemnitzi determined in the present study, suggesting that the specimen used for the P. radiata sequence was possibly misidentified.; Since P. fucata, P. fucata martensii and P. imbricata are synonymous, to study the genetic differentiation and genetic variation of such widely distributed populations is helpful in understanding their genetic connections. For this purpose, five populations, three from China (Daya Bay, Sanya Bay and Beibu Bay), one from Japan (Mie Prefecture) and one from Australia (Port Stephens) were studied using AFLP technique. Three primer pairs generated 184 loci among which 91.8-97.3% is polymorphic. An overall genetic among populations and an average of 0.37 within populations (ranging from 0.35 in Japanese population to 0.39 in Beibu Bay population) were observed. Genetic differentiation among the five populations is low but significant as indicated by pairwise GST (0.0079-0.0404). AMOVA further shows that differentiation is significant among the five populations but is not significant at a broader geographical scale, among the three groups of Chinese. Japanese and Australian populat... |
