Tissue Damage Characterization Using Non-invasive Optical Modalities

The ability to determine the degree of cutaneous and subcutaneous tissue damage is essential for proper wound assessment and a significant factor for determining patient treatment and morbidity. Accurate characterization of tissue damage is critical for a number of medical applications including surgical removal of nonviable tissue, severity assessment of subcutaneous ulcers, and depth assessment of visually open wounds. The main objective of this research was to develop a non-invasive method for identifying the extent of tissue damage underneath intact skin that is not apparent upon visual examination. This work investigated the relationship between tissue optical properties, blood flow, and tissue viability by testing the hypotheses that (a) changes in tissue oxygenation and/or microcirculatory blood flow measurable by Diffuse Near Infrared Spectroscopy (DNIRS) and Diffuse Correlation Spectroscopy (DCS) differ between healthy and damaged tissue and (b) the magnitude of those changes differs for different degrees of tissue damage. This was accomplished by developing and validating a procedure for measuring microcirculatory blood flow and tissue oxygenation dynamics at multiple depths (up to 1 centimeter) using non-invasive DCS and DNIRS technologies. Due to the lack of pressure ulcer animal models that are compatible with our optical systems, a proof of concept was conducted in a porcine burn model prior to conducting clinical trials in order to assess the efficacy of the system in-vivo. A reduction in total hemoglobin was observed for superficial (5%) and deep burns (35%) along with a statistically significant difference between the optical properties of superficial and deep burns (p < 0.05). Burn depth and viable vessel density were estimated via histological samples. 42% of vessels in the dermal layer were viable for superficial burns, compared to 25% for deep burns. The differences detected in optical properties and hemoglobin content by optical measurements correlated with the extent of tissue injury observed in histological stains. After proof of concept in animals, a human study was conducted and optical data was collected from 20 healthy subjects and 8 patients at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Blood flow index (BFI) values from the sacral region of patients were compared with those of healthy volunteers. Prior to loading measurements, baseline BFI values were measured in subjects in lateral position. These values were systematically higher for patients who developed open ulcers than for the other research subjects. While under the loading position, patients who developed a pressure ulcer had a decrease in BFI from baseline values an order of magnitude larger than healthy subjects (p < 0.01) and patients whose redness dissipated (p < 0.01). The hyperemic response, when pressure was released as the patient was moved back to a lateral position, showed a decreasing trend from one session to the next for patients who developed open ulcers. Overall, this work presents a novel non-invasive method of pressure ulcer assessment and provides an improvement over current assessment methods. The obtained results suggest the system may potentially predict whether non-blanchable redness will develop into an advanced pressure ulcer within four weeks from initial observation.