| Three low-carbon ASTM A514 microalloyed steels were used to assess the effects of austenite conditioning on the microstructure and mechanical properties of martensite. A range of prior austenite grain sizes with and without thermomechanical processing were produced in a Gleeble RTM 3500 and direct-quenched. Samples in the as-quenched, low temperature tempered, and high temperature tempered conditions were studied. The microstructure was characterized with scanning electron microscopy, electron backscattered diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and x-ray diffraction. The uniaxial tensile properties and Charpy V-notch properties were measured and compared with the microstructural features (prior austenite grain size, packet size, block size, lath boundaries, and dislocation density).;For the equiaxed prior austenite grain conditions, prior austenite grain size refinement decreases the packet size, decreases the block size, and increases the dislocation density of as-quenched martensite. However, after high temperature tempering the dislocation density decreases with prior austenite grain size refinement. Thermomechanical processing increases the low angle substructure, increases the dislocation density, and decreases the block size of as-quenched martensite. The dislocation density increase and block size refinement is sensitive to the austenite grain size before ausforming. The larger prior austenite grain size conditions have a larger increase in dislocation density, but the small prior austenite grain size conditions have the largest refinement in block size. Additionally, for the large prior austenite grain size conditions, the packet size increases with thermomechanical processing.;The strength of martensite is often related to an effective grain size or carbon concentration. For the current work, it was concluded that the strength of martensite is primarily controlled by the dislocation density and dislocation substructure; which is related to a grain size and carbon concentration. In the microyielding regime, the strength and work hardening is related to the motion of unpinned dislocation segments. However, with tensile strain, a dislocation cell structure is developed and the flow strength (greater than 1% offset) is controlled by the dislocation density following a Taylor hardening model, thereby ruling out any grain size effects on the flow strength. Additionally, it is proposed that lath boundaries contribute to strength. It is shown that the strength differences associated with thermomechanically processed steels can be fully accounted for by dislocation density differences and the effect of lath boundaries.;The low temperature ductile to brittle transition of martensite is controlled by the martensite block size, packet size, and prior austenite grain size. However, the effect of block size is likely small in comparison. The ductile to brittle transition temperature is best correlated to the inverse square root of the martensite packet size because large crack deflections are typical at packet boundaries. |
