| An increase in focus on the psychological, behavioral, and communicative influences on the wellbeing of children has led to changes in interventions during initial divorce court proceedings for co-parents. Key contributions of this paper comprise a deepening and refocusing on the theoretical foundations of divorce research by analyzing the link between communication style and custody arrangement, frequency of communication, and divorce experience; and by analyzing the connection between frequency of communication and use of technology. The results indicated that the use of technology did not influence the frequency of communication. Joint/shared custody and ongoing deliberation, as well as full (paternal) custody and ongoing deliberation, were significantly associated with protective communication. A protective communication style coincided with more frequent communication and a positive divorce experience; whereas, a laissez-faire communication style coincided with less frequent communication (e.g., both between co-parents and parents/children). |