Font Size: a A A

A Research On History Of Chinese Feudalism Discourse Innovation(1929--1939):from The Revolution Of Historiography To The Establishment Of The Road Of The New Democratic Revolution

Posted on:2018-04-28Degree:DoctorType:Dissertation
Country:ChinaCandidate:M R ZhangFull Text:PDF
GTID:1525305708979999Subject:Marxist philosophy
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
This dissertation is mainly about the paradigm of the Chinese social history and the theoretical discoruse of the Chinese revolution and the all kinds of phenomenon in daily discourse based on the conception of the "feudalism" in historical materialism of Marxism.The Chinese Feudalism Discourse Innovation is a well-known but indistinct theoretical phenomenon in the history of the Sinicization of Marxism.It is of special rational value and methodological significance.The basic views of this dissertation are the following.The Chinese Feudalism Discourse was formed from 1923 to 1939.Competing and struggling with other intellectual resources,this discoruse accomplished three transformations and innovations,including using the theoretical discourse of revolution and practices instead of the academic discourse of historical paradigm,using the revolutionary discourse of New Democracy instead of that of the bourgeoisie,and using the core words of the Sinicization of Marxism instead the discourse of the classic Marxism and Soviet Russia Marxism.These three transformations relieved the crises of Chinese historiography covered by the Western discourse hegemony during the Republican period,resolved the historical problem of how to know the "thing-in-itself’ of Chinese revolution,and pointed out the direction of the development of Chinese revolution and the road of the modernization.The Chinese feudalism discoruse played an irreplaceable significant role,in helping the Chinese communist strive for the cultural hegemony of revolution,in fully revealing the strong vitality of historical materialism resolving essential issues in China,and in forming the basement of the Epistemology and intellectual history of the Sinicization of Marxism.The first chapter considers that the Chinese Feudalism Discourse neither simply apply the western concept of ";feudalism" into explaining the "converse meaning" or "reverse meaning" ofthe Chinese ancient history,nor point out the transition from the thought pattern of "tradition of the domination under the sun" to "world history" in the Chinese traditional thoughts on feudalism,which was based on the grooming of the Chinese history of the traditional"feudalism",with the help of the concept tools of "epistemic type" from young Foucault and the"thinking type" from domestic scholars.This transition not only was an irreversible productive process of theory,but also transformed the concept of "feudalism" which was traditionally covered with political idealism into a general discourse on the linear time sequence of evolutionism.Therefore,a new platform was opened for the local Chinese history to have a conversation with the world history established by capitalism.This created the premise and probability for the rising of the feudalism discoruse of the Sinicization of Marxism.Staring with the three-folds of vision of the mode of production,namely the popular discourse in times,the sequence of the feudalism discoruse used by the early Chinese communists and the historical materialist turning of the "new history",the second chapter researches the origin of the feudalism discoruse of the Sinicization of Marxism.By a full-frame research based on the strict historical clues,this chapter demonstrates two aspects of meaning of the concept of feudalism of the Sinicization of Marxism.One aspect is the revolutionary discourse of anti-feudalism of the bourgeoisie;the other aspect is the concept of social formation from historical materialism within the theoretical frame of the Communist International.Additionally,the intersections among and common views shared by the Communist International,the Chinese Communist Party,and Kuomintang,as well as the turning of the research area of Chinese history,objectively promoted the Chinese people to accept the feudalism concept of the Sinicization of Marxism with a higher level around 1929.Focusing on the generative procedure of Chinese Feudalism Discourse from the angle of the cultural hegemony,the third chapter points out that this procedure underwent three periods of the understanding and application of the Sinicization of the historical materialism,of the scientific researches on the history of Chinese traditional society,and of the theoretical weapon of the Agrarian Revolution.These three periods not only formed a continuous process of penetration,but also were one of the Chinese feudalism discoruse from a popular discourse in times up to the discourse of leadership.Among which,the feudalism discoruse as the narrative of social science(historical materialism)could be treated as the epistemology of the Chinese revolution,the feudalism narrative of history as the historic view of the Chinese revolution,and the feudalism discoruse as the revolutionary narrative as the target positioning of the Chinese revolution.All mentioned constituted the overall theoretical base for the road of the new-democratic revolution.The formation of the feudalism discoruse of the Sinicization of Marxism is a successful practice of Lenin’s thoughts on leadership in Chinese revolution.It is also can be seen as a vivid dialogue with Gramsci’s thoughts on leadship during the same period.The forth chapter amplifies the methodological origins and the systematic process of the Chinese feudalism discoruse from the view of dialectics on unbalanced development,pointing out that the historical discoruse of feudalism as the research production of social science was systematized by the Chinese communists represented by Mao Zedong to the revolutionary discoruse of the Semi colonial and semi feudal by sufficiently abstracting the research production of the Chinese feudalism discoruse within the ideological and academic circles and using the dialectics of the unbalance of the contradiction.This dissertation furtherly considers that the Chinese feudalism discoruse is a theoretical constitution of high character of practice.The Chinese feudalism discoruse constructed by the Chinese communists represented by Mao Zedong established a successive example of two-way interaction of using Marxism to scientifically understand the history and reality of Chinese society and from the history and reality of Chinese society to deeply understand Marxism.As a result,it scientifically explains the special logic of the special object of the Chinese revolution.This is the theoretic base and the cultural roots of the new-democratic revolution.The conclusion once again responses all kinds of reproaches and criticisms and points out that as for the Chinese feudalism discoruse which constituted at specific historical stage(1929-1939),we should grasp the special significances in the intellectual history of the Sinicization of Marxism from the overall historicity,actively sublate the concrete knowledge and conclusions of distinctive brand of the times,and inherit and develop the tradition of method of epoch-making significance which appeared in the Chinese feudalism discoruse.Being original in the research perspective,theoretical method and data interpretation,this dissertation is the first academic works in domestic academic field so far,which makes a wholly and systemically research on the Chinese feudalism discourse innovation from the perspective of the ideological history of the Sinicization of Marxism.It is of important significance of enlightenment and reference to face the new problems emerging in the new practices of innovation and development of Marxism under the "Four Overall" strategic layout of contemporary China.So this paper makes some progresses in refreshing the historical paradigm of Chinese characteristics,deepening the research of the historic materialism and grasping firmly the Marxist cultural leadership.
Keywords/Search Tags:the Sinicization of Marxism, cultural leadership, the revolution of history, the new-democratic revolution, feudalism
PDF Full Text Request
Related items