| In this study, pigs at 65 kg of body weight differing in halothane genotype (HalNN, homozygous wild type; HalNn,heterozygous; Halnn,homozygous mutant) were employed to investigate the influence of halothane genotype on myofiber type composition and muscle energy metabolism, in association with meat quality.1.Comparison of meat quality traits among different halothane genotypes of pigsMeat quality indice including pH45min,pH24h,water holding capacity (WHC), meat color,W-B shear force of longissimus dorsi were measured.pH45min in Halnn wassignificantly lower than HalNN (P < 0.01), and there was no significant difference between HalNN and HalNn.pH24h Halnn dropped under 6.0, and significantly lower than that of HalNn (P<0.05). Meat color analysis revealed that L* and b* values in Halnn were both significantly higher than in HalNn (both P<0.05), and no significant difference between HalNN and HalNn was observed. W-B shear force values were similar between different halothane genotypes. Results indicated that HalNN pigs exhibited the best pork quality, Hann showed a slight PSE syndrome, and HalNn were the intermediate.2.Comparison of muscle myofiber type composition among different halothane genotypes of pigsMultiplex-PCR established by Tanabe et al (1999) was introduced to analyze the composition of contractile myofiber type in longissimus dorsi among different halothane genetypes of pigs. Results indicated that there were no significant genotype differences in the percentages of MyHCâ… andâ…¡a isoforms, but Halnn showing significantly higherâ…¡a and lowerâ…¡x,compared with HalNN and HalNn (both P<0.05).3.Comparison of energy metabolic indice and expression of metabolic enzymes and glucose transport related genes among different halothane genotypes of pigsSerum glucose concentraton in HalNN and HalNn was significantly lower than that in Halnn (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between HalNN and HalNn.Serum LDH activity in HalNN was significantly lower than that in HalNn and Halnn (P<0.05). There was no significant genotype difference in serum CK activity.Halnn demonstrated significantly higher glycogen and LD contents in longissimus dorsi compared with HalNN and HalNn (both P < 0.05), while no difference was observed between HalNN and HalNn.Besides, there were significantly lower CK and LDH, higher AMPK activities in longissimus dorsi of Halnn than those in HalNNand HalNn (all P<0.05). Real-time PCR results showed that GLUT4 and PGC-1αtranscripts were significantly higher in HalNN compared with Halnn, and no significent difference between HalNn and Halnn was observed. These results indicate that longissimus dorsi muscles from different halothane genotype exhibit distinct metabolic patterns.Taken together, the effect of halothane genotype on longissimus dorsi muscle of pigs at 65 kg body weight was dramatically significent, indicated by meat quality traits (pH values, WHC and meat color, et al),metabolic indice, as well as pattern of gene expression. HalNN pigs possess super pork quality, while Halnn exhibited mild PSE syndrome. Halnn had the highest proportion ofâ…¡b MyHC.Different metabolic pattern and MyHC might contribute to the formation of undesirable meat quality in Halnn.Besides, Halnn also exhibited significantly lower CK and LDH, higher AMPK activity as well as lower expression of GLUT4 and PGC-1αmRNA in the muscle. These results indicate that HalNN pigs have much higher capacity of energy metabolism both in aerobic metabolism and anaerobic glycolysis which may contribute to the better meat quality. |