Objective To investigate the protective effects of polarizing cardioplegia with sodium channel inhibitor tetrodotoxin(TTX) on ischemia/reperfusion myocardium of isolated rat hearts. The cooperative effects of Na+/H+ exchange inhibitor (Amiloride) and Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransport inhibitor (Furosemide) added in the polarizing cardioplegia solution were also studied. Methods Langendorff perfusion models and Neely working left ventricular perfusion models were sequentially created in 4 groups. The hearts in each group were arrested by different cardioplegia in Groupâ… (TTX), Group â…¡(TTX+Amiloride) , Group â…¢(TTX+Amiloride+ Furosemide), Groupâ…£ (control group, only STH-2). The arrested hearts were preserved in the corresponding cardioplegia solutionrespectively at 7℃ for 5 hours, and then reperfused. Pre-ischemic and post-ischemic indexes were studied including hemodynamic parameters, myocardial enzymology, ATP content, intracellular free calcium ion concentration [Ca2+]i ,and ultrastructural changes. Results There were no differences in four groups before myocardial ischemia. But the myocardial hemodynamic parameters during reperfusion in groups containing TTX(Groupâ… ,â…¡,â…¢) were respectively better than those in Group â…£(P<0.01). The releases of CPK and LDH in Group â… ,â…¡, â…¢ were less than those in Group â…£(P<0.05). The activities of Na+-K+-ATPase, Ca2+-ATPase, Ca2+-Mg2+-ATPase ; and contents of ATP in groups containing TTX kept relative higher level after reperfusion. Compared with depolarizing arrest group, [Ca2+]i in polarizing arrest group was relative lower. Myocardial ultrastructure was better protected in polarizing arrest group .Conclusion As a new and effective composition,sodium channel inhibitor TTX could prevent myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injuries caused by intracellular Na+-overload and Ca2+-overload , and reduce the consumption of energy by arresting heart under polarizing condition. Inhibitting Na+/H+ exchanger and Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransporter enhanced the protective effects of TTX. Therefore , compared with depolarizing arrest, polarizing arrest might be a more effective cardioplegia in myocardial protection and preservation .
|