Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a kind of autoimmune disease characterized by chronic and symmetrical multijoint inflammation, which result in joint malformation even lead to sever disability. The major damaged-target is synovial membrane. The cause of RA is still unclear. Recently, the role of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has triggered scientists'interests following the development of the role of Neuroendocrine-Immunity network in RA. HPA axis is important to suppress inflammatory reaction and regulate immune function. Glucocorticoid receptor (GCR) is not only the mediator of immune signals, but also the effective tool of immune regulation. The change of the binding capacity of GCR in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) has inner relationship with the development of RA. The non-specific anti-inflammatory effect of sinomenine may be shown by the way of stimulating HPA axis and increasing secretion of adrenal cortical hormone. However, there are few reports about the clinical and experimental research on the HPA axis mechanism of sinomenine in the treatment of RA. We, therefore, established the adjuvant-induced arthritis (AA) rats model and made a further study on the effect of sinomenine on joint inflammation, concentrations of corticotropin release hormone (CRH), adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), and corticosterone in plasma, expression of CRH and ACTH in synovium, and expression of GCR in PBMC, in order to explore the role of HPA axis in the pathogenesy of RA and the therapeutic effect of sinomenine.Methods: (1) 125 male Wistar rats were randomly and evenly divided into five groups,â… : normal group;â…¡: model group;â…¢: model group with low dosage of sinomenine treatment (15mg/kg·d);â…£: model group with medium dosage of sinomenine treatment (30mg/kg·d);â…¤: model group with high dosage of sinomenine treatment (60mg/kg·d). The AA rats of groupâ…¡,â…¢,â…£andâ…¤were established by intradermal injection of complete Freund's adjuvant(CFA). The success rate was evaluated by arthritis index (AI). Each group was divided into 5 subgroups according to the time point (7d, 14d, 28d, 35d and 42d) after the establishment of AA model. (2) From the 14th day after the establishment of AA model, rats of groupâ…¢,â…£andâ…¤were injected with sinomenine of different dosages. (3) The paw thickness was measured and AI was evaluated at different time point. (4) The concentrations of CRH, ACTH and corticosterone in plasma were detected by radioimmunoassay (RIA) at different time point. (5) The expression of GCR in PBMC was measured by radio-ligand binding assay using 3H-dexamethansone as the ligand. (6) Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of CRH and ACTH in synovium and intensity was analyzed by computerized image system. (7) Histopathology of ankle joint was observed and evaluated using histopathology integral. (8) The data were inputted into a computer and were analyzed by statistical package for the social science (SPSS) 14.0.Results: (1)AI: On different time after the establishment of AA model, AI of groupâ…¡was significantly higher than that of groupâ… (P<0.01) and it reached peak value on the 28th day. On the 35th~42nd days, AI of groupâ…£andâ…¤was lower than that of groupâ…¡(P<0.05), but AI of groupâ…¢was similar with that of groupâ…¡(P>0.05). There was no statistic difference among groupâ…¢,â…£andâ…¤. (2)paw thickness: From the 14th day to the 42nd day after the establishment of AA model, the paw thickness of groupâ…¡~â…¤was significantly higher than that of groupâ… (P<0.01) and the peak time was the 21st ~28th days. On the 28th day, the paw thickness of groupâ…¤was lower than that of groupâ…¡(P<0.05), and the time was earlier than groupâ…£for 14 days. There was no statistic difference between groupâ…¢and groupâ…¡on different time. On the 28th day, the paw thickness of groupâ…¤was lower than that of groupâ…¢(P<0.05), and the time was earlier than groupâ…£for 7 days. On the 35th day, the paw thickness of groupâ…¤was lower than that of groupâ…£(P<0.05). (3) Concentration of CRH in plasma: CRH of groupâ…¡~â…¤was lower than that of groupâ… on the 35th day (P<0.01). On the 42nd day, although CRH of groupâ…¢~â…¤increased compared with that on the 35th day(P<0.05), CRH of groupâ…¡~â…¤was still lower than that of groupâ… . CRH of groupâ…£~â…¤was higher than that of groupâ…¡on the 35th day (P<0.05), and CRH of groupâ…¢was higher than that of groupâ…¡on the 42nd day (P<0.01). It implied that high dosage and medium dosage of sinomenine could increase the expression of CRH in plasma on the 35th day, and the time was earlier than low dosage for 7 days. On the 35th ~42nd days, CRH of groupâ…£was higher than that of groupâ…¢, and CRH of groupâ…¤was higher than that of groupâ…£. It implied that high dosage showed the strongest effect, and low dosage showed the weakest effect. (4) Concentration of ACTH in plasma: ACTH of groupâ…¡~â…¤was higher than that of groupâ… on the 14th day (P<0.01) and the peak time was the 28th day. Although ACTH of groupâ…¢~â…¤decreased in the following time(P<0.05), it was still higher than that of groupâ… until the 42nd day. ACTH of groupâ…¤was lower than that of groupâ…¡on the 35th day (P<0.05), and ACTH of groupâ…£was lower than that of groupâ…¡on the 42nd day (P<0.01). It implied that high dosage of sinomenine could reduce the expression of ACTH in plasma on the 35th day, and the time was earlier than medium dosage for 7 days. Low dosage of sinomenine had no therapeutic effect during the experiment. On the 35th day, ACTH of groupâ…¤was lower than that of groupâ…¢. On the 42nd day, ACTH of groupâ…£was lower than that of groupâ…¢, and ACTH of groupâ…¤was lower than that of groupâ…£. It implied that high dosage of sinomenine showed the effect the most rapidly and the most evidently. (5) Concentration of corticosterone in plasma: Corticosterone of groupâ…¡~â…¤was lower than that of groupâ… on the 14th day (P<0.01) and the trough time was the 28th day. Although corticosterone of groupâ…£~â…¤increased in the following time(P<0.05), it was still lower than that of groupâ… until the 42nd day(P<0.01). Corticosterone of groupâ…£~â…¤was higher than that of groupâ…¡on the 35th~42nd days (P<0.05), but there was no statistic difference between groupâ…¢and groupâ…¡on different time. It implied that high dosage and medium dosage of sinomenine could increase the expression of corticosterone in plasma on the 35th~42nd days, but low dosage had no effect until the experiment finished. On the 35th day, corticosterone of groupâ…¤was higher than that of groupâ…¢andâ…£(P<0.05), and there was no statistic difference between groupâ…¢and groupâ…£. On the 42nd day, corticosterone of groupâ…£was higher than that of groupâ…¢, and corticosterone of groupâ…¤was higher than that of groupâ…£(P<0.05). It implied that high dosage of sinomenine showed the effect more evidently than medium dosage. (6) The expression of GCR in PBMC: The expression of GCR of groupâ…¡was lower than that of groupâ… (P<0.01) . After being treated with high dosage of sinomenine for 28 days, the expression of GCR increased compared with that of groupâ…¡(P<0.05), but it was still lower than that of groupâ… (P<0.05). It implied that sinomenine could increase the expression of GCR in PBMC. (7) The expression of CRH and ACTH in synovium: The expression of CRH and ACTH in synovium of groupâ…¡~â…¤were higher than those of groupâ… (P<0.01) on different time, especially for groupâ…¡. The peak time was the 28th day. Sinomenine could reduce the expression of CRH and ACTH in synovium. High dosage of sinomenine showed that effect on the 28th day, medium dosage on the 35th day, and low dosage on the 42nd day. On the 28th day, The expression of CRH and ACTH of groupâ…¤were lower than those of groupâ…¢andâ…£. On the 35th~42nd days, The expression of CRH and ACTH of groupâ…£were lower than those of groupâ…¢, and the expression of CRH and ACTH of groupâ…¤were lower than those of groupâ…£(P<0.01). It implied that high dosage of sinomenine showed the effect the most rapidly and the most evidently. (8)Histopathological integral of joint: Integral of groupâ…¡was higher than that of groupâ… on different time, and the peak time was the 28th~42nd days. Sinomenine of different dosages could reduce integral and the high dose had the strongest effect. On the 35th~42nd days, integral of groupâ…¤was lower than that of groupâ…¢andâ…£. (9) The correlation analysis: Paw thickness was positively related with AI, the concentration of ACTH in plasma, and the expression of CRH and ACTH in synovium (P<0.01). Paw thickness was negtively related with the concentrations of CRH and corticosterone in plasma (P<0.01). The concentration of ACTH in plasma was positively related with the expression of CRH and ACTH in synovium. The expression of CRH in synovium was positively related with the expression of ACTH in synovium (P<0.01).Conclusion: (1) AI was positively related with paw thickness. They could both reflect the swelling of joints, but the latter was preciser and more objective. (2) After the establishment of AA model, the concentrations of CRH and corticosterone in plasma decreased while the concentration of ACTH increased, which implied hypothalamic and adrenal defects. Sinomenine could adjust the function of the HPA axis, but it still couldn't reach the normal level. The effect of sinomenine was due to the dosage and time. The high dose showed the effect most rapidly and evidently. (3) After the establishment of AA model, the expression of GCR in PBMC decreased and the high dosage of sinomenine could increase it, which implied the low expression of GCR in the pathological process of AA and sinomenine's therapeutic effect. (4) After the establishment of AA model, the expression of CRH and ACTH in synovium increased, higher than the normal level, and sinomenine could reduce them. Its therapeutic effect was related to the dosage and time. (5) Sinomenine could effectively reduce the histopathological integral and suppress the pathological change of joints.
|