Study On Gadamar's Hermeneutic Experience

The study of experience is undoubtedly a major theme of Western philosophy. As Hans-Georg Gadamer in "Truth and Method," the second edition of the preface says: "the chapter on the experience of a programmatic occupies a key position." In Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics, its hermeneutics of experience with the basic position, while its unique experience in concept, is still the whole concept of the development history of the Western experience, occupies an important position. Thus, Gadamer's hermeneutics to explore in depth the experience of great significance.Gadamer's hermeneutics of experience in the criticism on the basis of our predecessors built. First of all, his analysis is a critical Bacon's "doctrine of experience." He believes that the experience of Bacon summed up the theory "was attached to a kind of epistemological interpretation of schemata, which explain the schema seems to me to reduce its original content" In other words, experience, effectiveness will depend on its verifiability, experience, meaning that it in principle repeatable, this experience is entirely from a scientific theory, start to look at problems, so that the inner experience on the abolition of the historic , while the "historic" is essential to the intrinsic nature of the experience; Secondly, he Husserl's " Phenomenological experience " was critical. In Gadamer's view, Husserl's description of experience with experience in genealogy as a life experience in the world it was before the existence of the scientific ideal, which try to explain the kind of experience in science appear idealized one-sidedness, which one way is for one-sided, because "he was always accurate scientific experiments into the original projection of an idealized world, the world's experiences. Accordingly, Gadamer through the analysis pointed out that the overall experience is not a traditional experience, the experience so far drawback of the theory, "they are absolutely starting to look at problems from a scientific and therefore did not note that the inner experience of the historic."Gadamer's critique on the traditional experience, at the same time, inherited from the front since the relevant experience of the ancient Greek idea of the meaning of the experience to be re-expression. Hermeneutic experience is the result of historical consciousness. Gadamer's on the ontological hermeneutics achieved after turning, discusses the understanding of time before structure, and pointed out problems such as the distance, the hermeneutic experience is the historical consciousness.Gadamer believes that hermeneutic experience and popular objects, popular objects that can be our experience of objects, it is like a "you" as their own speech, "you" is not an object, but a relationship with me at the , so how we see things spread, in essence, it represents a hermeneutic experience I have with "you" a variety of different relationships between the. Hans-Georg Gadamer examines three kinds of me and "you" relationship, concluded that, the third to me and "you" the relationship between the realization of a fusion of horizons, to achieve performance history, this effect is the hermeneutic experience of historical consciousness. Then three witnesses (Aristotle, Hegel,Αισχυλο?), described the experience of the characteristics of hermeneutics, that is the nature of hermeneutic experience is negative, open and limited. Hermeneutics of experience with the "problem" structure. Based on the above analysis, Gadamer pointed out that the results of the characterization of historical consciousness, indicating the direction of our research, which marked the experience of problem in the importance of hermeneutics. "In all experiences, pre-set structure of the problem, if no problems have been proposed, we can not have experienced. "Gadamer's view that the nature of hermeneutic experience is open, and open-ended but also has the problem structure. Nature of the problem has some significance, the question is open, the open-ended questions and being asked by the two aspects of composition, the question is concerned, it is itself conducting an open, but was a question, its openness answer lies in uncertainty. Hermeneutics experience to reveal in this way has been a question of what problems, thus constitute the meaning of questions, which indicates that the logical structure of experience in the hermeneutics, the difficulties raised more questions than answer questions. It is through a question and answer this way,Hermeneutics of experience in the question asked in an open field, as seen, this is the experience question and answer logic of hermeneutics.Gadamer's hermeneutics of experience can be described as unique, it is of great significance to the history of philosophy. Is a traditional experience beyond the maximum extent highlights the experience of meaning; for Gadamer achieved under the historical horizon to understand the historical truth and understanding of the consistency between the theory laid the foundation, Jia Da Moer Zhe school of hermeneutics to solve the problem of truth a new way; it is the heart of Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics areas is the key to an interpretation of hermeneutic thinking,At the same time, Gadamer's hermeneutics of truth there are still a number of difficult to solve the problem, Western scholars aroused widespread controversy. First, the Italian philosopher Betty that Gadamer's hermeneutics of experience against the methodology, as well as to explain the legitimacy of the status of objectivity in trouble, which lost its objectivity; Secondly, the German philosopher Jurgen Habermas also believe that Jia Da Merle erroneous and abstract, the hermeneutics of experience and scientific methodology in opposition, noting that the experience of Gadamer's hermeneutics, "the former see the" in the rectification of names to cover up the lack of reflection and critical spirit, this can not become a critical social Science.