Goethe And Schiller Literary Theory, Comparative

Goethe and Schiller lived in the same background, and years of working together, not only forged a great friendship, but also in literary theory, many of the same view. They insist arts to reflect real life, imitating nature. In nature-based, while adding subjective consciousness, to develop people's initiative to make art while reflecting the reality beyond reality, to achieve "beautiful" goal. Goethe that "art is the nature of the slaves, but also naturally dominate," Schiller that is the essence of art: "Art is the imitation of nature-based free expression." They all stressed the "natural" in the importance of art. In art theory, Goethe and Schiller came together finally, that "art should be in the show from the special general." In the art of fiction is concerned, Goethe and Schiller, or recognize the fictional imagination in the important role of artistic creation. Function on the theory of tragedy and art theory, more discussion of Schiller. Schiller has its own system of relatively complete theory of tragedy, tragic themes arising from the pleasure of his reasons for starting a more comprehensive discussion of the tragedy of the noble relations, and the aesthetic effect of the tragedy. Schiller Education functions of art very seriously, that aesthetic education by the people, to achieve the "perfect human" ideals in educate citizens, govern the country also has an important role. Goethe and Schiller in the definition of the nature of the United States is also coincide, and Goethe that "Beauty is a state of perfect freedom," Schiller then advocated "freedom of the United States is the reality." But they have some differences. For the natural essence of Schiller in that art based in reality, while greater emphasis on "freedom" that art is free, is pleasant. Ideals in literature, Goethe emphasizes the whole show features, and advocate the use of Schiller is to wipe out the contents...