Comparing Test Ways In Implicit Learning

Using materials generated by some original rules, we put familiarity into our researches. In experiment one, variables included learning state (learning or not learning) and familiarity reporting state (test while reporting familiarity, or test while not reporting familiarity). In experiment two, we operated guidelines, as well as the test serials. In experiment 3, we reconsidered the sensitivity of all kinds of tests used in implicit learning. In all of the three experiments, we found:(1) The evaluation of familiarity could significantly differ ruled materials from materials out of rule, in the mean time, familiarity evaluation could prove subjects' performance on classification;(2) Subjects' correct response increased during the process of test;(3) Recognition test was sensitive to our rules.(4) The conscious level was lowest in Classification, while higher in familiarity evaluation. Recognition needed more and more conscious when test goes on.