Heidegger's Poetic Redeem

Heidegger can be considered as one of the most ideological, original and widely known western philosophers in the twentieth century. His name occupied a unique position in the western ideological history because of his great philosophy that by questioning the meaning of Being, reflecting and criticizing the modern science and technology and concerning about the problems of modern social reality, he put his whole heart into researching for the way of poetic redeem to deal with and resolve the crisis of human living in the technological era. In a word, he had a deep thought that the homeless modern humans can find the way home in his Art and Poetry philosophy.The question of the Being is the most important point in his philosophical and aesthetic idea, because he completed the thought of Dasein, Art and Poetry just in the perspective of the fundamental Ontology. Thus, while the theory of poetic redeem can be regarded as the late Heidegger's idea that is that he switched his attention to the linguistics. But keeping trace to the origins of his idea must start with his questioning on the Being. Based on this, directly from the cutting point of questioning on the Being which was re-mentioned and questioned by Heidegger, the first chapter of the papers analyzed Dasein on the fundamental Ontology, reasoning and concluding that the real being of the Dasein is a poetic being.The reason for re-mentioning and questioning the Being is that the Being is forgotten. That the Being's subjectivity is forgotten makes the Metaphysics lead this era into a mechanism one and a homeless one. Therefore, chapter II of this thesis is to explore Heidegger's critical reflection upon the modern science and technology, which builds on Heidegger's concern about the human existential plight in the technological era, which is the realistic source of the theory of poetic redeem. On the basis of the argument above, this chapter will analyze the Metaphysics nature of modern science and the"Gestell"destiny of the modern technology and discuss the social situations and dangers in the technology era.As Holderlin said: " where there are dangers, there are powers of redeem." Chapter III of the papers is to explore Heidegger's poetic redeem idea for the homeless humans in the technology era. This chapter intends to start from the four aspects that are Heidegger's preference for Holderlin, the consistent of Poetic saying and Being,the vicinity and the community between poetry and mind, poetically dwelling on coordinating with Heaven, Earth, Mankind, God's freedom of the game and so on to analyze the saying Being acting as the Art and Poetry, rebuilding the human spiritual homes.Chapter IV is about evaluation of thesis of Heidegger's theory of poetic redeem, including its positive significance and limitations. On the positive, the chapter analyzes that poetic redeem provided both an opportunity to establish a poetic philosophy and the redeem way to get rid of the human crisis; With regard to the limitations, we stand on the perspective of the Practical Aesthetics of Marxist, making an analysis and criticism upon Heidegger's theory of poetic redeem which showed the color of the Utopian and the idealism tendency. We believe that Art and Poetry can not play the mission of redeeming, only the material practice that is the unity of man and nature is just the viable strategies of redeem for the humans marching from the kingdom of the necessity to the kingdom of the freedom.