The Satire Functions Of Pianwen

Word and meaning are symbiotic because of their nature to perform some certain purposes of language together. The biggest problem in criticism of Pianwen is artificial separation of word and meaning, which can not get the objective evaluation of Pianwen's function. Only take the symbiosis of word and meaning as the first foundation, can we farther research the problem of using word to express meaning. The key of expressing meaning lies in the adaptation of both sides. The form of Pianwen itself does not hinder the expression of context. On view of the literary works, some rhetoric like parallel forms and stroy in the discussion article are very common and conscious. On the view of Rhetoric and Communication, those rhetoric, such as parallel forms, stroy, word and so on, all have its particular rhetorical function. There are its rationality and inevitability of using that rhetoric. Pianwen, as the collection of these forms, naturally possesses that function. What's more, in the literary history, there are huge works that take Pianwen as discussion style, many of whom are great compositions, such as ,and paper of LuZhi. Therefore, a bias perennially exists in Pianwen's criticism, which should arouse enough attention and reconsideration to literary criticism's method, as well as the principle of adaptation should be applied to literary criticism.