| In judicial practice, the contract fraud crime is usually mistaken contract breach or common contract fraud behavior because of the ambiguity of the law, the judiciary's misunderstanding of the law and increasingly complexity of the contract fraud, which does harm to Law dignity and social justice. Focus of the issue lies in "illegal possession purpose" and subjective factors of the contract fraud crime. This writing aims to introduce the legislative idea and main factors of the contract fraud crime, to clarify the controversy of judicial practice, to find the better way to solve the controversy, to benefit judicial practice.This article is made of five parts: introduction, four chapters and conclusion. Introduction of this writing introduces the background and purposes of this article. The first chapter introduces the basic theory of contract fraud crime. The second chapter introduces the confusion and controversy of the contract fraud crime in judicial practice. The third chapter focuses on how to accurately identify contract fraud crime and proposed detail measures. In the conclusion part of this paper, the problem is reiterated and the ideas of this writing is summarized. |