Criminal Jurisprudence Of Airport Gold Case

In recent years, for various reasons, the case of Shenzhen Liang, Guangzhou Xu Ting, Yunnan Peng become hot topic to be discussed. On the one hand because the vigorous development of information networks makes the network media increase , increasing social transparency, so that People have to understand the extent of the case greatly increased.Grandpa Deng Xiaoping once said: "Practice is the sole criterion for testing truth." Legal origins of our country inherited the tradition of the civil law. Law exists as the form of the statute. Legal researchers have the pursuit of owning a clear code of law or bill. In the process of pursuing "full, clear, logical " , lawyers tend to pay more attention to theoretical research, specific issues, justice of specific cases is often not the focus of people's attention, so they formed the habit of paying more attention on theories rather than practice. But I think that this judicial habit seems to be putting the cart before the bias, since the development of theoretical knowledge should be from the soil of practice, without practical basis for the theory will only build castles in the air and eventually become an empty theory. The results and value will surely suffer doubts. So we can not deviate from the actual case and the closed-door research of our own theory, but for adapting the theory to practice and accompany the development of practice, so as to keep the pace of time, meet the psychological expectations of the people and society, the results of the trial should be trusted by people and the effect of the law can achieve the justice of the hearts of the people. Only can we truly achieve fairness and justice of legality. The law should be faithful, and the law that is faithful must be consistent with standards of fairness and justice, and the possibility of line with public expectations, for the faithful law not an invented, but written out of line with the law, as my teacher often says: "The law is common sense."For the reasons above, I take the choice of "Liang" case of the Shenzhen Airport for analysis and according to the case to lead to the difficult problems of theft and embezzlement cases. With the discussion from a variety of perspective, I analyze the basic facts of the case, using the theory with practice, from a comparative point of view, a historical perspective, and the methods of sociological research, to the focus of the controversy of the Liang case and the results I will give my analysis, conception and writing.The first chapter analyzes the traditional definition and composition of theft, embezzlement, difficult problems of crime object, then as the point of the judicial practice of theft, discussing burglary Relatives problems of the theft.The second chapter will analyze the case from the fact of airport gold case.The third chapter analyzes the role of the media from the media's impact of criminal justice.Conclusion section summarizes the main contents of this paper and explores the significance of the Liang.