| The crime of assembled prurience didn't really appeared in the judicial field from 97 "criminal law" provisions,. The academic circles do not pay much attention on this accusation until Ma Yao Hai case entered the public's view, which also have drawn much controversy. In this article, there are three major aspects to analyze this accusation. In the first chapter,trace the source of the accusation on legislation in China and investigate the same or similar accusation in foreign countries, drawn the conclusion that most intimate gathering promiscuous behavior is not defined as crimes and the mass promiscuous behavior is defined as crimes. In the second chapter, analyze the validity of the accusation. From the perspective of the relationship between law and morality and the non-victims of crime to analyze the existence of this accusation. drawn the conclusion that,make the crime of assembled prurience non-criminal in justice is possible; In the third chapter, analyze the issue about non-criminal of the crime of assembled prurience, analyze the constitutes of this accusation, the cases in the judicial field and how to implement judicial decriminalization. Through these aspects, it can draw the conclusion that the non-criminal partly of the crime of assembled prurience in justice will come true. As the gradual accumulation of experience in judicial practice, non-crime of the this accusation in the area of legislation will come true. |