Thetheory Of Criminal Law Of Water Environment Protection

In recent years, in view of the water environment of tough situation facing criminal law, world use for water environment protection strengthen become a trend. In this context, our country criminal law in 1997 for the protection of water environment is involved, have certain positive role, but in the new social development stage, the water environment pollution and destruction, the trend of the spread of quick take place continuously, major water pollution case law especially criminal law in water environment protection appear, inadequate investigate its reason, this and criminal law existing in water environment protection legislation flaws not relations.Yancheng "2.20" super water pollution case verdict and become the country's first launch of hazardous substances in water pollution of sin, and the conviction of similar after water pollution incidents in China shall be investigated for criminal responsibility, all is when major environmental accidents pollution sin, be investigated for criminal responsibility. A serious environmental pollution accident crime such a crime is criminal law amendment in 1997, after the new increase communications-related 12 years, what reason be let court opening new charges against liability with punishment hominids? From the perspective of social effect after the verdict but have no choice:so with public opinion, follow the trend of The Times. But, in this crime in the process of converting and whether the legal authority and seriousness facing important challenges, based on the above mentioned cases change the reason, criminal charges ruling the present status of environment protection to water and change the rational analysis charges ruling, the author thinks that:public opinion as a push effect, when social unacceptable degree is higher and higher, public opinion of the reform of promoting judicial level is particularly obvious. How to solve China's present criminal law in the existence of water environment protection in the legislative defect is this paper emphatically analyses the content.