| Price discrimination is a common action in economic life. Price discrimination from an enterprise with monopoly status is a form of abusing market domination according to the Antitrust Law. How to distinguish a normal economic activity of price discrimination form an illegal one and how the to protect the competition order, save the individuals'interests and safeguard the social welfare is a problem worth studying. It was a short term since the Antitrust Law implements. Theories about the price discriminatory practices are still nebulous and indefinite; the law applicable in the proceedings of the security also has deficiencies, especially the research on how to put substantial law into the judicial practice in this field remains deficient.This article is about a real case. Based on facts and laws, the author analyzes the focus of the issue from sides, giving views and comments from her own perspective of knowledge. Meanwhile, she offers suggestion and strategies to new problems reflected in this case.This article has divided into three parts. The first part introduces the"Case of Price Discrimination Behavior of the Telecommunication Operator" basic case, and sum up everybody's opinions and the main reason. The second part set about the distinction of normal price discrimination and the Antitrust Law sense of price discrimination. From the perspective of practice, she discusses the definition of relevant market and market domination, analyzing the rationality and giving comments on the plea from defendant. The third part centre on how the sue should goes on smoothly. It laid stress on the plaintiff's qualification, the court's jurisdiction over configuration, the litigants to the responsibilities assigned. Besides, she elaborates on the might-be involved antitrust investigation procedures and discussed the theory of Public Notice System, trying to proposing to the development of the antitrust sue procedures from aspects of theory and practice.
|
PDF Full Text Request