Administration Compenstaion Systerm In Urban Housing Collection

In recent years, with the acceleration of urbanization, urban housing levy abound. Urban housing property rights of citizens to protect human rights, the cornerstone of the implementation of constitutional government. Collection of housing in the city how to protect the citizens of the importance of urban housing property rights, protect the property rights of citizens rely on sound administrative compensation system. Unfortunately, due to the lack of law, leading real estate developers, local governments and the common property against acts of housing a large number of citizens present. Housing levy in the public interest and does not distinguish between commercial interests, ownership of the compensation for housing is unreasonable. Compensation is low, housing ownership less participatory, compensation led primarily by government and developers. Failed to reach a compensation agreement in the case, citizens will be forced demolition of houses, and resorts to evil forces, resulting in many tragic incidents. This paper from the city housing levy be imposed in the present situation without reasonable compensation, combined with relevant legal theory, China's urban housing levy imposed in the basic theory of executive compensation system, the existing problems, and improve the three aspects The inquiry.The paper is divided into three parts: the first is the charge of urban housing in the basic theory of executive compensation system. The author collected in the urban housing administrative compensation system to do a conceptual description, a summary of their legal characteristics to do. Of the system, some basic theoretical issues, such as the public interests of the city housing levy is a prerequisite for administrative compensation system, administrative compensation system and the difference between a civil compensation system, the city housing levy in executive compensation and the collection of rural houses The difference between executive compensation. In the final part, the author function of the system are briefly explained. The second part is in charge of urban housing problems in executive compensation system. The author briefly describes the status of the system, leads to problems in the system: the city housing levy administrative compensation system in the absence of legal, city housing levy in the premise of the administrative compensation system - is not clearly defined in the public interest, city housing Collection of administrative compensation system does not improve, the city housing levy administrative compensation system in the standards and unreasonable manner, the city housing levy in the administrative compensation system is not complete and other remedies. The part of the analysis of the problem, the improvement for the next part of the basic support provided. The third part is a collection of urban housing in the administrative compensation system improvement. In this section, the author proposes to tackle the problem of targeted recommendations. The innovative part is the author of some places, such as the definition of public interest, the idea of the three angles that the law, democracy, judicial process; advocated establishment of "full compensation"principle; on the scope of executive compensation, standards do A more bold vision, such as intangible losses, expected losses, compensation for moral damage. The author, based on the existing knowledge structure, carefully read the relevant books and papers, analysis of existing laws and regulations, more mature and learn from the experience of foreign countries, put forward their own suggestions.