| In criminal procedure, not all cases prosecutors must prove the case of contempt of court is not required prosecutors to prove, and so in common law countries it is a vivid metaphor for the "crime under the eyes of the judges." This paper on the contempt in court until the judge sentenced the meaning, model, and the judge of what should be established to direct contracting and other issues for analysis. Modern rule of law requires a country should have the supremacy of the law, which requires a court decision also has its inviolability and dignity of blasphemy. In our emerging contempt of court and court of law the dignity of the impact of causing a huge, seriously affecting the normal legal order, it must be sanctioned for contempt of court. Court case the judge is to direct contracting system designed to address these issues, but given the judges were punished directly to the power of contempt of court, if there is no restriction will be against public prosecution, contrary to the principles and avoid separation of accusation and trial, so the application of the system must be moderate and there are special principles and methods, the maximum reduction that seemingly "arbitrary" system of adverse effects.This paper uses the comparative analysis, summarized and so on, through our current "Code of Criminal Procedure," "Criminal" to disturb the order of the court judges the crime and the status of the provisions of sub straight and with foreign countries, comparative law, points out the existence of the existing legislation inadequacies, and a complete set of the current legislative proposals. Paper is divided into five parts, the first part an overview, the second straight sub-divided into the significance of the judge, the third straight for the judges sentenced some of the major mode of study and assessment of foreign, the fourth part is the judge of the lack of direct analysis of contracting system , the fifth part is the judge of court cases, the construction of direct contracting. |