Study The Membership Right Of The Condominium

Condominium　originated　in　those　cities　springing　up　in　slavery　era.　The　prosperity　of　industry　and　commerce　has　led　to　the　formation　of　many　cities,　and　at　the　same　time,　the　concentration　of　population　and　the　limit　of　land　produced　conflict　which　gave　rise　to　the　condominium　houses.　In　a　long　time,　this　condominium　has　not　been　recognized　by　law　until　the　Teutonic　legislation.　Due　to　the　slow　development　of　cities,　there　had　been　no　need　in　many　countries　to　establish　condominium　system　in　law　until　the　19th　century　when　the　industrial　revolution　made　population　increase　rapidly　and　the　land　price　soar.　Therefore,　many　European　countries　began　to　condominium　system.　The　20th　century　saw　mew　development　of　condominium　　system.　In　the　sixties　of　20th　century,　the　European　countries　have　completed　their　relevant　law　in　this　area.　In　the　last　decade,　China　has　started　the　legal　research　on　condominium.　The　dramatic　progress　in　real　estate　has　caused　many　disputes　which　poses　new　need　for　theoretic　support　and　legislation.　The　publicity　of　the　advised　civil　code　has　made　the　condominium　a　hot　topic　of　the　day. Historically,　there　have　been　various　theories　concerning　condominium　like　one　component　theory,　two　component　theory　and　so　on,　and　now　the　three　components　has　gained　its　dominant　position　on　this　which　says　that　the　condominium　composes　of　the　ownership　of　the　individual　part,　the　co-ownership　of　the　collective　part　and　the　membership　right.　It　is　in　concert　that　the　condominium　encompasses　the　ownership　of　the　individual　and　collective　part　of　the　premises,　but　whether　it　covers　the　membership　right　has　been　in　dispute　all　the　time.　This　is　mainly　because　of　the　inadequate　understanding　of　the　nature　of　the　membership　right.　The　theoretic　dispute　and　the　defective　legislation　have　brought　about　many　problems　in　reality.　This　paper,　based　on　the　three　component　theory　focuses　on　the　nature　and　characteristics　of　the　membership　right,　analyzing　its　content　in　order　to　reach　a　clear　and　comprehensive　understanding.　Since　the　realization　of　the　membership　right　is　closely　related　to　the　manner　of　execution　of　the　right,　and　if　there　is　no　a　practical　management　mode,　there　is　no　way　to　turn　the　membership　right　into　real　interests.　The　paper　makes　comparative　analysis　of　many　countries'　theoretic　research　and　legislative　practice,　utilizing　the　dispute　in　practice　as　a　footing　to　attempt　to　find　a　suitable　way　that　meets　China's　need.　The　paper　includes　two　parts:　The　first　part　starts　with　analyzing　the　structure　of　the　condominium. Based on the Pluralism, it focused on the quality and the characteristic of the membership right, and explains the rights and obligation of the membership right. We can recognize the particularity of the membership right that which is one part of the condominium bringing the impact to the realty theory in existence.　The　second　part　discourses　upon　the　mode　of　the　membership　right's　exertion　and　the　problems　in　existence.　The　exertion　of　anyone　right　needs　guarantee　and　restriction　by　law.　The　practice　of　the　membership　right　falls　across　many　problems　in　the　society.　　The　important　reason　is　that　there　are　not　a　academic　research　in　focus　and　legal　sustaining　at　the　practical　approach　except　for　its　mode　of　the　exertion.　This　part　analyzes　the　legal　nature　of　management　organizations,　and　clarifies　the　legal　relations　among　those　organizations.　At　last,　the　paper　puts　forward　constructive　suggestions　on　the　solution　for　the　legal　embarrassment　in　existence.