Study On The Nature And Distribution Of Tort Liability Of Communal Facilities

This　paper　originally　comes　from　my　thinking　on　some　"　special　civil　infringement　cases　"　in　recent　years.　Cases　having　some　kind　of　public　factors　were　often　settled　by　the　vessel　outside　the　institution,　which　makes　me　think　of　the　system　itself.　The　starting　point　of　the　paper　is　to　find　out　what　kind　of　tort　liability　is　the　country　responsible　for,　because　the　standard　of　state　compensation　decides　what　kind　of　compensation　liability　can　be　solved　by　the　in-institution　vessel.　However,　to　e xplain　one　concept　with　another　concept　doesn't　help.　After　comparing　the　national　compensation　standards　between　China　and　some　western　countries,　the　writer　finds　that　what　cause　the　standard　differences　of　compensation　liability　between　these　countries　are　the　different　relations　between　the　society　and　the　country　behind　the　institution　The　specific　institution　problem　cannot　be　resolved　by　regarding　providing　Communal　Facilities　as　a　duty　of　the　state,　because　the　problem　needs　to　be　resolved　is　how　to　distribute　the　liability.　I　analyze　the　resolution　under　the　current　legal　system　and　oppugn　the　subject　qualification　of　the　civil　tort　liability　of　the　administration　organ.　Chapter　One　compares　the　compensation　standards　between　our　country　and　some　other　countries,　and　finds　that　what　causes　standard　difference　of　compensation　liability　is　the　different　relation　between　the　society　and　the　country.　Chapter　Two　surmise　up　the　historical　development　of　the　tort　liability　of　the　communal　facilities,　and　explores　the　methods　of　solving　compensation　liability　of　communal　facilities.　Chapter　Three　explains　several　theories　of　Liability　Distribution　of　Relevant　Persons.　It　probe　into　the　way　of　distributing　liability　in　the　trend　of　"　public　affair　private　to　manage　"emphatically.　Chapter　Four　ends　up　the　thesis　with　some　suggestions　on　the　establishments　of　a　new　system.　It　also　tries　to　explore　the　scope　of　national　compensation...