Discussions On Certain Problems Of Administrative Litigation When Public Security Agency Acts As Defendant

The subject of this paper is administrative litigation when public security agency acts as defendant. The definition of administrative litigation when public security agency acts as defendant is summation including activities and relationship of law when citizens, legal persons, and other organizations think that the concrete administration behavior that the public security have done infringes their legitimate rights and benefits, so they prosecute in accordance with Administrative Litigation Law and the court umpires the suit. For the feature of public security agency and the feature of administrative authority of public security agency, compared with administrative litigation when the other administrative agency acts as defendant, administrative litigation when public security agency acts as defendant has several characteristics. Since Administrative Litigation Law has been issued, administrative litigation when public security agency acts as defendant has made great achievements, meanwhile, some problems also occurred. This paper tries to analyze the problems caused from administrative litigation when public security agency acts as defendant, generalize the reasons and put forward corresponding countermeasures.The paper consists of the foreword, three chapters and conclusion. The foreword explains why to choose this theme and point out how to unwrap and discuss. In the first chapter, through discussing the definition and features of public security agency and administrative authority of public security agency and administrative litigation when public security agency acts as defendant, the author points out several characteristics of administrative litigation when public security agency acts as defendant compared with administrative litigation when the other administrative agency acts as defendant, analyzes significance of studying administrative litigation when public security agency acts as defendant, all of which lay road for deepening the next context. In the second chapter, the author introduces several problems existing inthe scope of administrative litigation in administrative litigation when public security agency acts as defendant, analyzes the problems and excogitates proposals to settle that problems. In the third chapter, the author introduces several problems existing in the litigant in administrative litigation when public security agency acts as defendant, analyses the problems and excogitates suggestions to settle those problems. In the fourth chapter, the author introduces several problems existing in the judicial authorities in administrative litigation when public security agency acts as defendant, analyses the problems and excogitates proposals to figure out those problems. In the conclusion, the author points out that a lot of questions demand our exploring further and discussing urgently in other respects beside the above-mentioned exposing problems, and makes outlooks to the future of administrative litigation when public security agency acts as defendant.