On Improvement Of Human Rights Protection In China's Police Criminal Enforcing Practice

Public security organs, with the power of criminal law execution, play a key role in China's criminal enforcing practice. In the establishment of human rights protection system in police criminal enforcing practice, with the influence of the traditional legislative guideline concept, emphases are only put on criminal law execution while human rights protection esp. the criminal suspects' is neglected and quite a few problems exist in the detailed system. This leads to a great gap between China's police criminal enforcing practice concerning human rights protection and international criminal judicial norms, which is obviously disadvantageous to our human rights protection esp. the criminal suspects'. Therefore, it has been theoretically and practically magnificent and urgent to study the problems of human rights protection in police criminal enforcing practice and find efficient improvement measures. Four parts are designed in this thesis:Part One gives the elemental theory outline for human rights protection in police criminal enforcing practice. In this part, it mainly studies the connotation and characteristics of China's police criminal enforcing practice and analyses its detailed execution performance and the relations between police criminal enforcing practice and human rights protection.Part Two describes the requirements of international criminal judicial norms to human rights protection in police criminal enforcing practice. This part makes the study from two sides. One is the general requirements and the other is the detailed requirements.Part Three discusses and analyzes the problems from the establishment of human rights protection system in police criminal enforcing practice. This part, with international criminal judicial norms as the background, discusses the problems, from the aspects of system establishment aim, the default of giving criminal suspects the right to silence, right limitation of criminal suspects, the default of establishing rules for excluding illegal evidences, enforcement measures malpractice and the unreasonableness of the detaining legislative system. This part also analyzes and...