Study On Perfecting And Innovating The Government Crisis Decision-making System

According to the laws of development process of the world, it is critical period of"economic imbalance easier, social disorder easier, psychological imbalance easier, social ethics need to be adjusted reconstruction" to the courtiers of which personal GDP about 500 to 3,000$. China is experiencing in that critical period which corresponds precisely with the "frequency unstable stage" in the sequence spectrum of social development. This brings many troubles in social contradictions and conflicts, and threat to people's life and property and become a resistance to building the harmonious society. Consequently, the government should implement the concept of"service for people", intensify the crisis management as an important task, and institutional innovations improve capabilities of the crisis decision-making systems, then, improving the capacity of flouting crisis. What with the reality of our country belong to the duration for crisis frequently and the inefficiency of the government crisis decision-making system, so this paper intends to improve comprehensively the government's crisis management capacity by improving the crisis decision-making system.Part one for the foreword. First, this part of the topics discuss the backdrop of selection together with domestic and abroad study actuality to clarify the choice of this topic; Then, Based on the ideas of "question-analysis-solver"to presetting the structure of the thesis; lastly, to introducing the research methods,innovation and emphases of the thesis.Part two will elaborate the basic concept. The crisis, the government crisis management, crisis decision-making and the government crisis decision-making are defined in this part. this part tell us crisis decision-making is different from the conventional decision-making, which be provided with the features for non-procedures, timeliness and limited; to achieve the objective of controlling and defusing the crisis rapidly , crisis decision-making should uphold the principles of combining with prevention actively and response rapidly , combining with decision-making rapidly and co-operation with one other , combining with pre-crisis decision-making and happened-crisis decision-making and adopt the methods of decision-making analysis rapidly and expert advice and emergency activation of the plan. Part three tell the crisis situation of the Western countries of the decision-making system on behalf of the United States and Japan. Firstly, the authors expatiate the United States government crisis decision-making system with six characteristics and the Japanese government crisis decision-making system with four characteristics; then, the authors generalize the common characteristic of both them to provide the successful experiences and help.Part four explain status quo of our government crisis decision-making system. First, the authors generalize that it has achieved a certain degree of success for our government crisis decision-making practice, But still some difference with the level of developed countries in the West and the people's expectations, which pave the way for exploration the back of the analysis and countermeasures; Then, the problems of Chinese government crisis decision-making system the authors are scanned and anglicized comprehensively by the authors.Part five explains the strategies of perfecting and innovating the government crisis decision-making system. Firstly, with four "favorable" to describe the importance of innovating the government crisis decision-making system; then the authors explore to countermeasure from four modules with concept transformation of crisis decision-making, optimizing crisis decision-making structure, strengthening crisis decision-making system, crisis decision-making for more scientific, democratic and law-based.Part six tell about the research findings and follow-up work, which act on complimentarily and summarization.