Study On Time Limit System For Adducing Evidence

To solve the issues on surprisingly adducing evidence in justice practices, improve efficiency of action, and develop and perfect the civil litigious system of China, the Supreme People's Court promulgated the Several Rules on Civil Procedure Evidences in December, 2001. With the promulgation the time limit system for adducing evidence is first defined in the judicial interpretation. What's the source of the system? What's the legal-principle value of it? How do the related law systems of the representative countries in the "two families of law" be constituted? This paper defines the time limit system for adducing evidence, and analyzes value of the system by starting with base theory of the system; using the comparison method to study and dissect the legislation examples on time limit system for adducing evidence of America, France, Germany, Japan, and China's Taiwan. On the basis of a textual research for the evolution of the time limit system for adducing evidence of China and an analysis of the present operation situation the system in China, this paper finally advanced an idea that ought to introduce a mandatory plea system, and exactly define the loss of right on evidence so as to build a reasonable time limit system for adducing evidence.